D
Deleted member
Guest
You missed the point entirely.It should be noted, however, that the Bull Charge is an instant knockdown for Little Mac. The KO Uppercut is not a guaranteed 1-hit KO by any means.
The only ignoring the facts is you, Irene.Why should I when it's accurate. Stop ignoring the facts here. Wolf had one chance to come back after being cut from the initial roster. Sakurai did not care that he was "easy to come back". All DLC characters had actual reasons for returning the vets. Mewtwo because he was most popular to begin with. Lucas for Brawl vet. Roy for Melee vet. Wolf had nothing beyond a game he's in to come out. It was that or... nothing. And he had nothing. Slippy was not coming to Smash at that point(maybe a later game, but he had nothing over Wolf when they were in the same position, just one is more popular and a vet, in 4).
Even if Star Fox Zero was to be released a month before Fire Emblem Fates' US release, we would not have had Wolf instead of Corrin. Why? Multiple reasons:
a. Corrin legitimately promotes Fates due to being the game's protagonist while Wolf does a VERY ****ty job at promoting Zero. Use common sense here. How does someone who only serves as a side enemy that has little overall presence and is in absolutely no promotional material for the game itself do anything to promote it? Just because "he's in it"? Give me a break.
b. Corrin is a fresh new face with new tricks no one has seen yet; Wolf is an old face that uses the same old tricks that we've seen before. And some of those tricks are derived from another character, albeit with more of a distinct flair.
So really, the only thing you're right about is that he had "nothing" for him ever since Lucas was the "Brawl" choice. And very few of us understood that (myself included) until after the fact.
You need to stop pretending you know what you're talking about.Sorry, but your argument doesn't work at all when you actually understand Wolf's issues with being in Smash 4. Slippy would've been viewed solely as a replacement and would have gone horribly. It was either both, Wolf, or none, realistically. None won out due to Star Fox Zero being delayed(Star Fox Guard the same thing). I would've gladly taken both, but there was no way either could get into 4(returning and new depending which one) outside of promotion anymore. We need to stop pretending that promotional purposes aren't heavily used for characters sometimes. It's not wrong or incorrect to do. It's just a reality thing.
First of all, the reason I brought up Slippy is because of your promotion ramblings. Because HE IS SOMEONE WHO CAN ACTUALLY PROMOTE THE GAME. If "promotion" were the main factor, it would be him, not Wolf. It means jack who's more popular between the two if you argue in the case of promotion and only one of the two can actually be used to "promote" anything.
Neither were going to be considered in regards to "promotion" either way, but still. How people would have seen Slippy doesn't hold any sort of relevance considering how Corrin was perceived could have been predicted (and even WAS predicted), but he was still added anyway for the sake of promotion.
You want to preach promotion, but so far you have shown me that you clearly haven't the slightest clue how promotion even works. So you are in no position to be telling us how we think and we need to think.
No, it's not the "reality" of the situation.Wolf was "can we promote him? No? Meh, not worth the time." That's the reality of the situation now. Something that's better to accept as the only feasible explanation at this time. If anything, Sakurai really should just go out and admit it or prove the most feasible theory wrong. Clearly it's at a stalemate.(and yes, simply put, I do not believe any other situation would've made sense, so that's my hard explanation I'm sticking to, and no other one is very convincing at all as a good reason to bring him back).
The "reality" of the situation is that we literally don't know the exact reasoning as to why Wolf wasn't DLC.
And until we do, literally every theory (in your OWN WORDS), no matter how "feasible", is just that. Theory.
But the moment you try to claim a theory that, let's be honest, you've fabricated all on your own to rationalize what happened, as the "absolute truth" that everyone has to follow is the moment you've made yourself the least credible voice of reason.
Last edited by a moderator: