On the contrary, most Sheik mains started playing Zelda from the get go......and as the metagame progressed jut found out she was terrible. It had nothing to do with stubborness.
Yes, I have seen so. But even the best sheiks made some of the WORST "professional" Zeldas. I'd seen casual zeldas who played better zeldas than the tourney sheiks of the time did.
Except MK's nado/specials are good and Zelda isn't.
Its more like using MK and never using his down b.
no. Because that ignores the fact that Zelda IS better than sheik in certain situations. To ignore something that can give you an advantage because in other situations it doesn't is stupid.
Though the matchup is silly, and it doesn't particularly matter, a good example of an analogue is sheik's chain. Despite, genereally speaking, being one of the weakest skills in sheik's repetoir for anything save recovery, the havoc it can wreak on any ganondorf when used well make it an incredibly effective tool.
Nothing FORCES sheik to use the chain at any other time, but against Ganondorf, why wouldn't you?
Bottom line:
You have access to an entirely different moveset that, in certain situations, is better than your normal moveset. In those situations, Why wouldn't you use it if you could? It seems insane to me that you'd limit yourself to half of a character.
The better half most of the time, to be sure, but when you can switch so easily, WHY would you ignore that option.
And seriously Chad. You're posts are doing NOTHING to adress that so much as reitterating "Zelda sucks" in whatever is your flavour of the day fashion. If you know better, stop being stubborn and stop trolling. If you don't, try to learn and stop trolling. Either way, stop plaguing the zelda boards with troll post after troll post.