loslobos
Smash Cadet
With the stage, its clear Sakurai is aware of Paper Mario, and a lot of people wanted him, but Dr. Mario was the chosen 2nd Mario. Did this affect Paper Mario's inclusion?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nintendo was so close to actually winning the debacle over Tetris since they own the most popular and best selling games under its image with over 33 million copies sold. I don't think you quite understand there were a half dozen or so companies all sold the rights to Tetris and they all got ripped off, as well as the creator (who now owns the Tetris Company and is finally getting paid for his iconic work.) I agree it won't appear outside of musical references because that is the only part of it that Nintendo rightfully owns now. I won't talk about its legalities anymore because I do not think we are fully understanding each other. I do agree that tetris appearing as a stage is improbable for the near future.I'm making a very simple point here. That yeah, they could have claimed to be the rightful owners, but that doesn't mean that when the dust settles they are going to let bygones be bygones and let Nintendo get even more freebees. When they fought so hard to get Tetris and missed out on so much lost revenue from Nintendo in the meantime, that they will probably be extremely reluctant to have Nintendo get their IP for free. You can't claim that Nintendo was shafted when they made millions off of something that was determined later to not legally be theirs.
Nintendo's claim to the property was one of the loosest claims ever though, it was like a landlocked country in Africa claiming part of the Arctic. And Nintendo only helped keep it in legal limbo by making that claim so they could avoid paying royalties for what later became the rightful owner. I don't think they ever really expected to win their case. So Nintendo didn't get "screwed" when the the man who created Tetris ended up getting his due as the creator and owner of his work. Nintendo screwed him. Tetris games do get released for Nintendo consoles still but I really doubt given the history the guy is going to give Nintendo a break and loan his property for free to Smash, and I think that's kind of how 3rd party stuff gets into Smash - it is either free or not at all.Nintendo was so close to actually winning the debacle over Tetris since they own the most popular and best selling games under its image with over 33 million copies sold. I don't think you quite understand there were a half dozen or so companies all sold the rights to Tetris and they all got ripped off, as well as the creator (who now owns the Tetris Company and is finally getting paid for his iconic work.) I agree it won't appear outside of musical references because that is the only part of it that Nintendo rightfully owns now. I won't talk about its legalities anymore because I do not think we are fully understanding each other. I do agree that tetris appearing as a stage is improbable for the near future.
Because Sakurai never worked on a Doctor Mario game....if Dark Pit can have his own victory theme why can't Doc have one too?
Without a doubt the black one, but the purple one also looks nice
1. . . . . . 2 . . . . . . 3 . . . 4 . . . 5 . . . . . 6 . . . . . 7. . . 8
Which is your favourite Palette Swap for Dr. Mario
I dunno whether it's the black or purple one! I guess I'll just alternate between them when I play him.
1. . . . . . 2 . . . . . . 3 . . . 4 . . . 5 . . . . . 6 . . . . . 7. . . 8
Which is your favourite Palette Swap for Dr. Mario
As if Sakurai wouldn't make Paper Mario a flat clone of Mario...rofl he's a scrublord when it comes to that.I would have loved to see Paper Mario in Smash 4 and what his moveset would be like and what his final smash would be. I don't think that Paper Mario would really be a clone of Mario because there's a lot about Paper Mario that's unique to him. Even though I'm a little upset that Paper Mario is not in the game, I'm still really excited that I can be able to play the Doc.
A clone is better than someone who would be an original character?Lastly, Dr. Mario is way better than Paper Mario and I hope he was chosen over Paper Mario despite evidence to the contrary.
I think customizing every standard move is excessive to the point that it's not really something that I think they should aspire to (except for maybe Mii Fighters).I hope not. I'd think by the time Smash 5/6/whatever comes out, they'll have improved the character customization and costumes to the point that you can build Dr. Mario off of Mario.
Nothing so excessive. Just that if you use the Doc skin, the visual effects change, and the A moves can have stat re-distribution, attack, speed, etc. That's what I'd like to see over more skin-clones, anyway. The only significant A move difference between the two is the down-A, right?I think customizing every standard move is excessive to the point that it's not really something that I think they should aspire to (except for maybe Mii Fighters).
...Nothing so excessive. Just that if you use the Doc skin, the visual effects change, and the A moves can have stat re-distribution, attack, speed, etc. That's what I'd like to see over more skin-clones, anyway. The only significant A move difference between the two is the down-A, right?
No, Nair and Fair are still the same overall attacks, just with different timing and physics. Easy enough to tweak in a character editor....
Nair and Fair
They're the same, except for the latter having entirely different properties and the former being arguably the most unique Fair in the game.No, Nair and Fair are still the same overall attacks, just with different timing and physics. Easy enough to tweak in a character editor.
But, let's not derail the thread with my negativity. I've said my piece and made my case.
Alph and Olimar say hi. There is precident. And you've dragged me back in.They're the same, except for the latter having entirely different properties and the former being arguably the most unique Fair in the game.
And it also raises the question of what the point is of having them as the same character. It's debatable whether or not they're even the same person, and why have the "same characters" vary so widely? It doesn't really make sense to have two characters in the same slot, rather then just giving them two different slots [except for the Koopalings, we don't need seven Bowser Jr. clones]
I meant for "different characters" to mean both mechanically different as well as that.Alph and Olimar say hi. There is precident. And you've dragged me back in.
Also, most unique in that it's exactly the same as Mario's but with different physics. So unique!
Actually....there's...quite a bit. DSmash is stronger in terms of kill power and the back hitbox is actually STRONGER than the front one, Bair has different KB growth, D-Throw has entirely different physics, their movement speeds are vastly different and their jump heights are different along with their fastfalls. Their damage values vary on a lot of moves as well. Doc's recovery and Up+B is much worse recovery wise but it has a sweetspot and only hits once like Luigi's but slightly better, Doc Tornado is back, FSmash has less range, pills have different physics...the list is pretty vast to the point of where actually playing with both side by side will yield very obvious handling differences, given that I main Mario and Doc respectively.Nothing so excessive. Just that if you use the Doc skin, the visual effects change, and the A moves can have stat re-distribution, attack, speed, etc. That's what I'd like to see over more skin-clones, anyway. The only significant A move difference between the two is the down-A, right?