Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I hope that there isn't one for at LEAST 7 years.Leave the roster alone.
Just hoping for a new smash in the near future.
So am I, I'm sorry, but Starfox 64 was the last good Starfox game.i am honestly glad krystal didn't make it...i am so much more happy that wolf made it in instead of her
DS was pretty good. It was just a little bit repetitive.So am I, I'm sorry, but Starfox 64 was the last good Starfox game.
Correction, LYNDIS was the most deserving female character. Then Midna. Then Krystal..What's with the Krystal hate. Maybe her games weren't as good as the newer games in the opinions of the classic Star Fox players. But she holds more importance character wise now-a-days, and hers games have sold more.
Plus she's the most deserving female character not already in.
I'm not sure about Lyndis, but Krystal was more well known world wide. And is a major character now for all the Star Fox games since her inclusion till the death of the franchise. Lyndis is no longer in the FE games. Midna is high up, but her character for all we know disappeared into twilight at the end of TP.Correction, LYNDIS was the most deserving female character. Then Midna. Then Krystal..
Krystal is in the game, but it's not a good cameo. And Krystal fought in the beginning, and have you ever played Assault? She can fight.Well apparently Lyndis is more deserving than Krystal because at least she made it in the gameAnd Lyndis deserves it more as she was the character that introduced FE to America and she can actually, you know, FIGHT, instead of being trapped in a crystal for her entire game.
Quoted for truth!Correction, LYNDIS was the most deserving female character.
It's a band wagon thing, at least regarding Geno and it's fairly obvious when you look at the join dates of the people that are estatic that he didn't make it. Really, as I've said in other posts, these are basically the people that said Sonic was nothing more then a pipe dream simply because they hated him and believed that Waluigi was guarenteed to be playable simply because of the supposed "Wario Bros" factor. Basically, it's a bunch of people letting out pent up frustration because he was a character that a decent number of people wanted, they didn't understand why or let alone even know who he was and thus he OBVIOUSLY shouldn't be in Smash Bros. Keep in mind these are also the people that argue that Geno's significance is laughable while Jigglypuff has done more then her fair share to earn a spot in Smash Bros.Dang. A lot of Geno and Midna haters and just so its clear in my first post I meant that I wanted as many characters as there could be. Theres really no one I wouldn't have been happy with.
Wow, that's faulty logic right there. Some characters really are not ideal at all. >_>I'm just saying I really don't think there's a good reason for any character to not be playable. It doesn't make sense. There's too many good characters in the Nintendo world that I can't really be happy that anyone didn't make it.
Are you kidding, SMRPG is easily one of the most underrated Mario games. Also, in that game, Geno was all around the best character stat wise.Wow, that's faulty logic right there. Some characters really are not ideal at all. >_>
And the reason I don't want characters in. Like Geno for one, it actually looks really wrong to put him playable next to Mario. I'm a huge Mario fan here, and I really think it's an insult to Mario if Geno were playable, and we seriously don't need Mario himself to be more underrated as things are. It's like putting in a Paper Mario party member as playable, which nobody wants. And Geno is like....unbelievably overrated, just like the game he came from. He's really not all that good.
No, it is overrated if Geno can have a fanbase. The battle system especially is mundane and repetitive. The out of battle elements do not include party members. Geno being statistically the best means nothing for him being in Brawl. It just means he does well in a mundane battle system. He is still just a party member who can't do anything out of battle.Are you kidding, SMRPG is easily one of the most underrated Mario games. Also, in that game, Geno was all around the best character stat wise.
Toon Link rocks!Because people who hate Toon Link are messed up in the head.
How can it be underrated when it got a true sequel no more then 3 years after it was released while SMRPG hasn't had a true sequel and its been about 12 years...No, it is overrated if Geno can have a fanbase. A game is overrated because people like a particular character in it... You are aware of what you just said right? The battle system especially is mundane and repetitive. And yet it was the game that basically set the basic mechancies for every other Mario RPG following it. What about the concept of Star collecting, a feature of nearly every Mario canon game afterwards, where do you think that came from? What about the concept of flower points and equipping badges/pins? Should I also mention that SMRPG was basically the first major joint project between Nintendo and a third party? If you look at all the Nintendo spinoffs and joint projects now, it's more then obvious how significant that is. The out of battle elements do not include party members. Geno being statistically the best means nothing for him being in Brawl. It just means he does well in a mundane battle system. He is still just a party member who can't do anything out of battle. And neither can Marth and Ike in their respective games and the pokemon have limited abilities outside of battle, what's your point?
The real underrated game is Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door. It is literally the best RPG game ever (the ONLY bad thing about it is maybe it is a little bit easy), and nobody seems to acknowledge that.
There are too many people who say this is an excellent game. It is not close to being an excellent game in anything except length and story really. The battle system sucks too much for it to be a good RPG, and that generally makes the game really repetitive considering the game's length.How can it be underrated when it got a true sequel no more then 3 years after it was released while SMRPG hasn't had a true sequel and its been about 12 years...
This, and also Waluigi and Dark Samus. There may be more I'm forgetting.Geno & Megaman
Define a good RPG. Really, what is so completely God Awful about SMRPG. A simplisitc story? At least it was the first Mario game that had a complete plot and, low and behold, character development. Repetative at times? Even RPGs like Chrono Trigger had this problem. The fact that uphold it above a game you like more? Golly Gee Wilikers, I think I've come to the root of the problem... Really, this explains your hatred of Geno in a nutshell. People like SMRPG and remember it fondly and there's a decent amount of demand for a sequel, but, despite the fact that Paper Mario is far from neglected (which you seem to believe), you think it is and therefore, it's "obviously" SMRPG's fault...There are too many people who say this is an excellent game. It is not close to being an excellent game in anything except length and story really. The battle system sucks too much for it to be a good RPG, and that generally makes the game really repetitive considering the game's length.
You don't understand FE at all either. It's not the same genre of RPG. It is RPG strategy. It has a completely different focal point than the standard RPG we are talking about. Seriously, what were you thinking? Comparing the standard RPG to FE doesn't work the way you're trying to argue.
It could be argued that Pokemon isn't exactly your standard RPG either. The point is that you argue that if a character doesn't have any attack functions outside of battle should not be in Smash Bros. If you want to extend your logic even farther, Captain Falcon and Fox should have never been considered given the nature of their respective franchises.
With Pokemon, you have massive customization options which you don't get in SMRPG. SMRPG is generally quite linear in terms of battle system. And being able to do some stuff out of battle >>>>> doing absolutely nothing outside of battle.
See first comment.
You can say a game inspired future concepts. That doesn't stop it from being a terrible game. Take SMB1. It's overall crap. You know, despite it basically being the blue print for every other platformer that followed it and being dubbed one of the best games of all time, time and time again in the past 20 years...How much more apparent do you want to make it that you're judging SMRPG simply based on YOUR experience with the game? It's like saying that just I don't like the Godfather, it completely sucks and is a cinematic mess with no artistic qualities what-so-ever. Screw the fact that it won a ton of Oscars and how people have been raving about it for decades, it still sucks... The physics suck, and it makes it very easy for Mario to die, which makes the game repetitive. The game is also extremely linear. Yet it inspired Mario being able to toss around Koopa Shells and Throw Fireballs in later games, like SMB3 and then SMG which are awesome. SMRPG is not a good RPG, and nothing will change that.
Please leave your comments outside of what you quote. Just for convenience of others when they try to reply to you. >_>Define a good RPG. Really, what is so completely God Awful about SMRPG. A simplisitc story? At least it was the first Mario game that had a complete plot and, low and behold, character development. Repetative at times? Even RPGs like Chrono Trigger had this problem. The fact that uphold it above a game you like more? Golly Gee Wilikers, I think I've come to the root of the problem... Really, this explains your hatred of Geno in a nutshell. People like SMRPG and remember it fondly and there's a decent amount of demand for a sequel, but, despite the fact that Paper Mario is far from neglected (which you seem to believe), you think it is and therefore, it's "obviously" SMRPG's fault...
This is how I respond to things because it keeps things organized and its easier to read compared to "floating rebuttals."Please leave your comments outside of what you quote. Just for convenience of others when they try to reply to you. >_>
I'll emphasize again, you completely don't understand how FE is separate from other RPGs. It is a completely different RPG genre from your standard RPG. Pokemon fits under the standard RPG genre. What's to argue? Yes, the standard RPG genre has variations. Pokemon still fits under it. (random battles, world map to explore where you can buy stuff and go to inns to rest for the night yo). And what kind of BS are you giving me that Fox and Falcon don't belong? They actually star a series. Geno doesn't. Mario stars SMRPG (hence the name, duh). Your point being what? Your arguement was that if they couldn't fight outside of their franchise's context of a "battle" then they shouldn't be playable because they are obviously bland in that regard. You weren't argueing whether or not characters had enough sigificance (which is barely even a factor which I'll explain later), you argued about how they act outside of "battle."
And you're going to deny that SMB1 is an outdated piece of crap? Considering how a decent number of people still play it and how it has been remade and released a ton of times with little or no alterations...It's not a good game at all. Is it fun? Heck yes. But it still is terrible. Again, how can you say its terrible with what I mentioned before? Can we just admit that your view on the game is dwindled down to your perspective and therefore you believe its law? And of course I'm judging SMRPG with my experience with the game, and I'm being as unbiased with it as possible. It is not a good RPG at all. Geno literally has less of a role in this game as Paper Mario members do in their games, yet nobody gives a **** about those. Geno was the only character that was truly intertwined with the game's plot from beginning to end. Really, the repair of Star Road was essentially his problem because he was the protector of it. Until Geno came along, the character really didn't know what the Star Pieces were for and Frogfucious, who's supposedly the smartest character in the game, could only stab at what their significance was. As for the Paper Mario helpers, most of them were only sigificant during certain chapters and usually became little more then tools after those points. Case in point: Lakister in the original and Bobbery in TTYD. Really, none of them had any true role in the game's core plot except for Goombella and Vivian in TTYD.
SMRPG's story is one of the better parts about it. What are you talking about? The battle system is overrated crap and it's not a good game because of that. My problem with Geno lies in he's just a party member in a game he doesn't even star in. One time. Now you ask him to be playable. If you can't say it looks wrong for Mario and Geno to be next to each other playable, that's where the problem lies with all of these video gamers. And I suppose there's nothing wrong with having Jigglypuff and ROB being hightlighted as Nintendo All Stars. Really, Sakurai said himself that significance actually plays a small role in what characters become playable. These are the four standards that he laid out at GDC:
1. They have to have unique qualities.
2. People will actually want to play as the character because of these qualities, whether they know who the character is or not.
3. They have to easily be integrated into SSB system of fighting with as few alterations as possible.
4. They can't be invinsible or completely useless and they have to have their own strengths and weaknesses.
Seriously, how does Geno not fit in these characters? If you ask me, he shines brighter then most characters do in the first two categories. People simply do not give Mario the respect he deserves, and it really saddens me. The Mario franchise has the most items, stages, music, trophies, stickers, and technically the most characters in the SSB franchise. The Mario characters also have a wide range of significance in the SSE. Seriously, what are you talking about? You act like the Mario franchise is completely neglected. Honestly, some people argue that there's too much Mario representation and here you are saying that it hasn't gotten any respect...
And ROB did? As Sakurai explained at GDC, terms of significance play a small, almost non-existant role, in which characters become playable. In other words, Sakurai actually didn't tie all that much meaning to the term "All Star."Geno had no place with Nintendo all stars.
I agree with all but two. If u played MP2 and MP3 you know how much Dark Samus deserved to be in Brawl and how much she would not be a cloneGeno
Dark Samus
Animal crossing character
Midna
WW Link (we dont need two links, OH BUT WAIT, HE MADE IT! ****)