- Joined
- Aug 13, 2001
- Messages
- 34,515
- Location
- Cull Hazard
- NNID
- Irene4
- 3DS FC
- 1203-9265-8784
- Switch FC
- SW-7567-8572-3791
He's also an Assist Character. No, he is not "just a boss". People were heavily wrong about that, and it does matter because his role is severely unique. And he's a more unique version of Flying Man as well, due to having a transformation and acting near identical to a normal playable character. The fact he's willing to help you was normal normal "boss" behavior. People were correct to think he was unique, because he actually was.Honestly, I no longer subscribe to the "If it's different or unique from the others of its ilk, it MUST be special" mindset, especially after Ridley. People did everything they could to argue that there was absolutely no coincidence between Ridley and the other "shown but not confirmed" characters, that it HAD to mean Ridley was unique or special. He wasn't. He was a boss, like everyone thought he'd be. Sometimes things ARE just black and white.
And yet we have a person who did consider WFT well before this leak. That's a fact. And it wasn't just Sakurai. She was hard to guess, but don't act like it was impossible when there is proof that somebody did. The actual message itself. It doesn't matter if it was a joke thread, which is arguably in itself as to the thread's quality, it's the fact that somebody explicitly guessed her. As for Villager, yes he was unlikely, but that completely assumes people think a character who Sakurai put down whas zero changes next time around. For the average user, that's expected. Anyone doing research would know many characters he considers do indeed become playable later, no matter why they were removed. Mewtwo(who managed to do this twice of all things), King Dedede, Wolf, and Bowser are just a few. Thinking Villager may be playable later on is actually not unreasonable at all.I don't even NEED to: getting the WFT and villager were already WAY outside the realm of guessable possibility. No one even considered WFT to BE a friggin' character before she was revealed, and villager had already been blacklisted by Sakurai from Brawl.
That's great, which proves to me was he was overall legit, not that he could not have lied at any other time. Sal is not the leaker, however. He's the messenger. However, I'd like to note to you this "passing grade" stuff does not matter whatsoever. Guessing a ton of stuff right isn't the factor, it's how he got every single one right to be in the game in general and most of them at the right time, including a character that is completely new to the world. That sealed what made him legit. The chances of guessing those all is low, yet still not completely impossible. But you do not get a new character right before they were going to revealed.Again, Gematsu is 8 of 10 right, which as I said is still more accurate than the Pokemon leak yet no one tries to angrily dismiss that guy. 8 of 10 is a passing grade on any test that I know of. I give Sal credit for giving us a sizable chunk of the roster long before it was revealed.
He was not that hard to guess, as many thought he could be in. Well before it, so that's not correct either.Not to mention the fact that the ENTIRE reason Shulk was so popular in fake leaks was because of Gematsu...
Which does not mean he was planned to be playable, but nothing more than an Assist Character, and being the main character of a game, got a High Quality model. This is no less possible. The fact he said he considered him(and maybe that's a translation error) means giving him a notable model was a stage in planning. Not that he will be playable, but he intended him to be in the game in a notable role no matter what, which he still is.As Vanrose pointed out, the leaker could've been on one part of the dev team that didn't know what the others were doing and could've seen the HD Chrom model and assumed.
Because unlike you, Sakurai doesn't use simple logic. He's done completely unique things nobody thought of. He made Ridley a Hazard/Assist character. Not a lame boss again. But an actual combination of Assist Trophy and Stage Hazard. Nobody really predicted that, just thought Ridley was highly special(and they were right).And why don't you explain the logic behind EVERY OTHER NINTENDO-MADE SMASH RUN ENEMY COMING FROM A PLAYABLE FRANCHISE, except for the ones from RH. Why is Rhythm Heaven so special that it gets representation in smash run while not having a playable character? Why not any of the DOZENS of more popular Nintendo franchises that could've also been represented via smash run?
You don't know if it had anything to do with a special rule. Also, as noted, Find Mii also has it without a normal playable Mii. The Miis are special and actually SSB characters, not from the Find Mii series, making three franchises with enemies without playables. Notably, we do not actually if the planned normal Mii was going to be represented via Find Mii, so that logic doesn't actually exist for them either. This can only actually apply to Ice Climbers, and the rest are still completely unprovable theories. Miis are iffy, but maybe possible. And so are Rhythm Heaven. Stop pretending a rule for how Enemies work exists. You do not know, and are still apply logic of something that may be a pure coincidence, that somebody made an assumption of, just like you are doing now.
It's not guenuine. It's a severe assumption that you know how Sakurai created and directed Smash run. When multiple stages show up with no character, it's pretty clear a series does not need a character to be playable to reprsent it. How can it not legitimately apply to Smash Run? Do we have a statement that it doesn't apply? Until he actually says it's a rule he decied, it is not very good evidence. It's a fair assumption, but evidence is highly pushing it, especially caling it "Strong". The only strong evidence for Chrom is the interview at best. Do you know why? Despite the translations being weird, he actually told us Chrom was in the running in some way. That's it. A model does not prove anything. There's other possible reasons besides "being playable" that he could have a high quality model. One I mentioned up above. Why is not that actually possible? You talk about this black and white crap, but refuse to admit that maybe, just maybe, there is more than meets the eye here?Once again, it's not like Sal predicted Dixie Kong, Lip, Professor Layton etc. and we're insisting that THOSE characters (with no evidence to support them whatsoever) were just honest mistakes and Sal should be forgiven for them. We're talking about stuff that HAS genuine evidence that points to it was either playable or could legitimately be mistaken for playable.
Just remember, 3 franchiess at least have enemies. Potentially more.
-Ice Climber: We knew for a fact he worked on them.
-Rhythm Heaven: Does not have a playable character, and no solid evidence to show so.
-Find Mii: As there's zero implication that Miis were going to be under this franchise before being transformed into the Mii Fighters, a unique and unused concept before, this is not solid evidence whatsoever.
Lastly, Sakurai has never once said or even implied Smash Run would only use enemies from playable franchises. If you can prove he said this, go ahead.
I'll leave with this; Stop assuming so much. Not everything is some conspiracy and solid evidence means it's not really questionable at all. The interview was not even questionable. We definitely knew by them something was up with Chrom, just not the exact details. And it's slightly iffy, but only due to translations issues that could have come up. As his messanges even on Miiverse are changed around to mean something different, translation problems are common enough to take into consideration. We know for a fact that Sakurai thought of using Chrom. And that's as far we can legitimately get due to the rasing of most of the data. If you can find actual gameplay data of the Chorus Men, then we can show they were planned to be playable but cut for whatever reason. But this not exist. No interview exists. Just an assumption Smash Run uses a fan-made rule. That is the not very solid at all, and you need to seriously stop pretending it's unquestionable. Plus, the SSE had original characters unrepresented by a playable franchises. The SSB series had no playable rep till Smash 4. And Smash Run is pretty clear a remake of much of the SSE's style, the only exception being the reason to go through it(and direct Multiplayer VS Co-op/Single Player). Note how I'm taking tons of details into account. They all have relevance here.
Another issue is that just because IC's did it, every other franchise that has a Smash Run enemy(2 unrepped) somehow must have a planned playable character. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. It's still an assumption, that no real detail from Sakurai's interviews say anything about. Or a Miiverse post. Now, if they did and I missed it, please point it out. Till then, you haven't provided proof that this is actually a thing, and thus, is a highly questionable premise to go off of. Because frankly, you have done nothing to support the theory with any actual evidence it's a thing, just throwing out questions as if they actually will support it. By saying it must be a thing, you are implying Sakurai made this rule. If he did, you can certainly cite this and prove your case. Do so, and sure, you have a real theory that is somewhat supportable. But as of now, you're leading people on with a very poor premise that doesn't hold real water. To put it even more bluntly; "My position is unbreakable because I say it is." That's seriously how the theory comes off as, which does not actually provide useful input in this discussion. It's a perfectly viable theory, but calling it evidence is pushing it. Especially since you have shown no intention of proving that theory actually right. Asking a question like that doesn't prove anything right, it's just a question you know nobody can answer, and thus, you will always win. If you continue to do this, I'm reporting. Either give legitimate proof, or just accept your theory is okay, but not evidence.
People do keep saying that supposedly people guessed Mii Fighters. But nobody has provided true evidence of that, namely citing where it came up well before the leak. If not before the message. If they can do that, even better. It doesn't prove other than the character name was guessable, but not at the exact same time the character will be revealed, however, which kind of does matter. If I missed the post where somebody properly cited, apologies for that.
Which is not in any way actual evidence, just theories at best, one that are unsupportable. You need solid evidence to prove that theory right, which you have not given anything thus of. Right now, it's basically a conspiracy-type theory at best. What we want is you to cite where this "Smash Run is only repped by planning franchises" as some kind of a fact. It's not impossible, and nobody is saying it is. We're saying, to put it bluntly, there's no way to actually be sure it's truly the case. We're talking about planned characters. We need more than a major set of assumptions here. Especially when another franchise is completely unrepresented(Find Mii), and there is no extremely good reason to believe Miis were indefinitely going to be under that. Could they have been? Sure. But we were only told Miis were intended to be playable, but revamped to Mii Fighters. We were not told what franchise they'd be under, which means we cannot really claim this that easily.Also, when it comes to Smash Run, we're looking at simple pattern recognition, here.
In addition, since you loved to cite "pattern recognition", there was no playable SSB specific character in Brawl, where the SSE used the same ideal setup for its Enemy choice, as did the original Adventure Mode. The difference is Adventure Mode didn't have Weak Enemies from an unrepped franchise, but the SSE did. That actually means, going by a pattern alone, Sakurai has clearly no issue putting in Enemies from a franchise being unplayable too. That's just as logical as what you're saying. As they did decide to make an SSB character playable(and Giga Bowser only barely counts, as he did not gain his Smash Symbol in Brawl, being treated as a Mario character at that time notably), but even then, that's still 3 franchises without playable characters. 2 of which only arguably had planned ones, and one that we know did. Logic dictates by that alone, we should assume that 2/3 wins as well. I'm playing the exact same numbers game as you, keep in mind, so there's a lot of issues I find with your logic that doesn't quite well fit. In the end, no, I do not believe the Smash Run thing means anything in reality and may even be completely worthless as knowledge. They may have had even more enemies planned with no playable characters entirely. I am not counting some of the Namco ones since they do show up in Pac-Man games, and thus, could legitimately fall under that franchise. And if you don't, that's a fourth one without a playable rep, Dig Dug(and more I could've missed). The evidence is really not as strong as you think it is, and I'd say thinking outside the box and not applying assumptions as perfect logic is a bit important here. Sakurai already recognized the series enough to give them trophies. Why is it so hard to believe he found the enemy interesting for a rare one no less and threw it in? Just like he threw in the Hanenbow stage, that was not meant to have a representative of the playable variety. Even Smashville is different, being that he meant to have Villager playable at one point, but it never got past the consideration stage(which is not the same as planned, meaning they were programmed somewhat into the game beyond a simple model only, as frankly too many characters get that and simply become a Trophy if it doesn't work out. It doesn't mean really much in the long haul).
Last edited: