- Joined
- Aug 7, 2012
- Messages
- 9,582
- Location
- Buffalo, New York
- NNID
- ScoliosisxJones
- 3DS FC
- 1762-3194-1826
My initial stance was hypothetical. That original comment was to lend credibility to the argument I was trying to make. However, after you clarified that he asked for a specific time frame for choosing a character, I realize that makes it different (hence why I said to disregard that sentence because I was wrong lol).Source.
Last I checked, Anna is considered the mascot, especially in Japan.
I'm not ignoring it because it makes a fallacious point. IS didn't "include" anybody. They gave a suggestion. Sakurai isn't under any obligation to follow a suggestion, so if he does follow one, it means Sakurai sees something in that suggestion.
In the case of Ike, he saw potential for a fighting style that contrasts Marth's. None of the other options save for Hector could supply that.
Never claimed you were.
However, your examples really fall apart;
1) We're talking in terms of characters; NOT designs or stages (which is a flawed argument in itself, as for every "recent" stage, we get an older one to go with it). Aside from that, in terms of design, Sakurai was going for a particular universal "look" for the characters. Logic dictates that the TP style fit the look more than the OoT style.
2) They DID pick stages from other Mario games. We have Luigi's Mansion (which wasn't recent by any stretch since it debuted before Melee), Mushroomy Kingdom (based on the first two levels in Super Mario Bros.), and Mario Circuit (which is an amalgam of different Mario Circuits over the years). Not only that, but Sunshine wasn't even recent in Brawl's time.
3) You're right; that IS the weakest point. Being recent and being selected as a Poké Ball summon are not mutually exclusive. It isn't a case of "oh, these guys are newer, I must include them somehow", but rather "oh, these guys didn't exist last time, let's see which ones would be interesting to include". Note how Brawl received BOTH 3rd Gen and 4th Gen summons rather than just 4th Gen because it was newer.
"Also, consider this. Let's say Ike was chosen by IS because he was recent, or the "new and exciting thing" along with his game. It is arguable that Roy was the same thing based off of Sakurai, however Roy was to be included in Brawl, meaning he wasn't getting rid of him. If he goes to IS and wants their input, they very well could say Chrom, because his game is their "new and exciting thing" whether people like it or not. Recency DOES mean something in this case. Again, arguably, each character besides Marth was brought in because of that."
You seem to be backpeddling your initial stance.
That was not the initial argument; do not change the goal post.
Your point was that it plays a role on character selection specifically.
Quite honestly, I think that it is in the realm of possibility that recency played some sort of part in character choosing. Maybe not as much as I thought, but I believe it is there. Really, who's to say he doesn't find something interesting to work with for Chrom? We won't know that until he is either confirmed/ disconfirmed (it's not deconfirmed right?). I'd like to see both Roy AND Chrom.
Like I said, we'll see. Good points though Golden. Good discussion.
ALRIGHT. I WANT DISCUSSION GROUPS BACK. RIGHT NAOW.