Kirby Dragons
Smash Hero
I don't see Squirtle and Ivysaur coming back, nor do I see a reason for them to come back.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'd feel mixed, but more positive than negative, that's more characters than I'd expect for a port, and more stages are always welcome but, I'm assuming since you didn't mention any balance changes that there's a lack of balance changes to the Smash 4 cast, which'd be very disheartening for me personally. I doubt most people would care.That kind of brings up a question.
Your reaction.
Smash 4 port.
Has all Smash 4 characters + Inkling + (with moveset altercations/luigification if necessary)+ New Stages.
One new mode.
What do you think?
Personally, I'd love to see Decidueye since one playstyle I've always wanted in Smash was that of a true archer character. Not like Link or Pit, who shoot an arrow for one move each, but a more full moveset of archery, kind of like Green Arrow in Injustice of Hawkeye in MvC. Being a Grass/Ghost owl just strengthens the appeal for me. Not to mention it allows it to pepper in some wing and talon attacks.i see people putting desidueye as a contender. any reason why though? and how would he fight?
You will not get that from Decidueye.Personally, I'd love to see Decidueye since one playstyle I've always wanted in Smash was that of a true archer character. Not like Link or Pit, who shoot an arrow for one move each, but a more full moveset of archery, kind of like Green Arrow in Injustice of Hawkeye in MvC.
I would passThat kind of brings up a question.
Your reaction.
Smash 4 port.
Has all Smash 4 characters + Inkling + (with moveset altercations/luigification if necessary)+ New Stages.
One new mode.
What do you think?
You're missing the point entirely.You will not get that from Decidueye.
Do you know what Green Arrow and Hawkeye have that Decidueye doesn't?
a. wide assortment of arrow types to use
b. an actual bow that can be used as a weapon for close range combat
Hey. They can't get in.Here's my question to people that want Goku.
.....why have Goku.....when we could have Broly instead?
Broly could be an alt costume maybe.Here's my question to people that want Goku.
.....why have Goku.....when we could have Broly instead?
I wish I could like this post multiple times; it's a shame that nobody in Smash 4 played like him.As soon as gets back in I'm sold. They could add whoever they ****ing want after that. All I need is Snake.
Eyy **** that.Hey. They can't get in.
Not form a game, not in.
I'd enjoy Squirtle, Wolf and Snake immensively. And I'd probably try to get some skill with Pichu just because. 7/10. Would be satisfied.That kind of brings up a question.
Your reaction.
Smash 4 port.
Has all Smash 4 characters + Inkling + (with moveset altercations/luigification if necessary)+ New Stages.
One new mode.
What do you think?
I wish I could like this post multiple times; it's a shame that nobody in Smash 4 played like him.
I definitely agree that some veterans could use a moveset overhaul (Samus and Zelda come to mind) but honestly that's more of a case of Technology Marches On mixed with Sakurai's insistence on not alienating fans of veterans. I don't necessarily see it as a thing to hold against newer characters.I'd enjoy Squirtle, Wolf and Snake immensively. And I'd probably try to get some skill with Pichu just because. 7/10. Would be satisfied.
To be honest, I want them to seriously alternate a few character's movesets. I have never played the games, but I know for certain that characters as as well as and play a LOT more like their character in their original games than a lot of veterans!!
And to be honest, this is really not fair. Why would they give those characters better treatment than excisting veterans, just because they where later additions? In Brawl, at least every new character kind of flowed with what was already established. That's why a lot of new characters in Smash 4 are a big eye-sore to me (there I said it, SORRY NOT SORRY!).
From all excisting characters, just a few new faces really blended it well with the established (Brawl) cast and didn't fully rely on gimmicks, like most new characters. Characters I feel that aren't overly gimmicky and would've fit in the Brawl roster for example are: (best example to be honest!) and (Mac less so than the others). Bordering characters are: & . and cheat themselves into these categories cause of them being clones.
The roster is honestly a mess right now, and I don't think all this quantity really means for better quality. This especially becomes apperant when a character like joins in. was specifically balanced NOT to be like Cloud; fast, strong, long reach AND a projectile (like Ike as a Fire Emblem character; a total beast). Yet Cloud can pull it off cause he's got the '3rd party wild card'?? I think this is very hypocritical. And I DO NOT want a character's representation in Smash to suffer because of it.
I mean...
doesn't even use his magic and weapons and fights with a mostly made-up style with only a FEW hints to his villain role in The Legend of Zelda.
doesn't even use proper Psychic attacks or telekinesis in his moveset, Shadow Ball, Disable and Confusion are a poor representation of his character, even if everything else is cool (ever since the buffs of course)
is becoming a worse and worse representation of her abilities in Metroid every incaration in Smash! I especially find this bothersome with characters as running about with a 'all projectile moveset' that should've mostly been Samus's playstyle. At the very least she should be able to run and shoot.... And thank the Universe that Screw Attack finally kills....
What's worse, they threw around character revamps to a few characters that don't really need them... For example (was FINE as she was) and . was understandable, so was ... But Zero Suit Samus and Sheik only became more overpowered than they where at their prime.
Smash 4's roster was a mess, and so was it's balance. I disliked pretty much all the newcomers except the ones I mentoined above, and it was made clear that some characters got far more love and especially attention than others, even at the cost of popular veterans: THE VERY CHARACTERS THAT MADE THIS GAME POPULAR!
See, I got a lot more to rant about than Impa. Smash 4 was a mess. A beautiful mess with good gameplay, and a huge roster, SURE! But there's a lot that can be, and SHOULD be improved on. And one of the things I want most is more accurate and flashy apperances of the Nintendo veterans that need it more than some "paid fanservice"...
Olimar? Yes I could see him as a Smash 4 newcomer but he's not nearly as bad as others. Robin would make for a good traditional Smasher if he didn't have this weird weapon durability thing going for him. I mean, if that was truely a thing for Fire Emblem characters, Roy would be even MORE useless.I definitely agree that some veterans could use a moveset overhaul (Samus and Zelda come to mind) but honestly that's more of a case of Technology Marches On mixed with Sakurai's insistence on not alienating fans of veterans. I don't necessarily see it as a thing to hold against newer characters.
Heck, even Brawl had a case of a character breaking the established Smash mold to be more like their own games. Moveset wise, I'd say Olimar is more similar to the Smash 4 newcomers than most veterans. I'd also probably add Pac-Man and Robin to the list of more "traditional" Smashers, since the former lacked a gimmick and the latter's wasn't overbearing (more similar to Olimar's really).
I'd be fine with it, but I seriously don't see why we need 3 ****in Links.That kind of brings up a question.
Your reaction.
Smash 4 port.
Has all Smash 4 characters + Inkling + (with moveset altercations/luigification if necessary)+ New Stages.
One new mode.
What do you think?
That was just to include every veteran.I'd be fine with it, but I seriously don't see why we need 3 ****in Links.
And then watch people complain about how Ganondorf and Zelda are turned into generic swordfighters, regardless of how unique their movesets would turn out.We'd all kill for HW Ganondorf and Zelda, don't lie to yourself.
I wanted Zelda with a rapier ever since I saw the first trailers of Twilight Princess.And then watch people complain about how Ganondorf and Zelda are turned into generic swordfighters, regardless of how unique their movesets would turn out.
You have a difficult time telling when someone's joking and when someone's serious it seems.Hey. They can't get in.
Not form a game, not in.
There are so many reasons why that wouldn't really work..... 0_oBroly could be an alt costume maybe.
Inb4 we get Calamity Ganon.Best Ganon is trident Ganon
Whenever you say Calamity Ganon I think of Calamity Jane so I'm imagining a female cowboy GanonInb4 we get Calamity Ganon.
Am actually mad cause I actually did think Skyward Sword is great, and it'll probably get a lot of love in the upcoming months. Considering the 'last Zelda is best Zelda meme' that is going on since forever. And it excists for a good reason! Cause every next Zelda title, they are going to do their best to over compensate for the weaknesses of the previous title, or fan complainst.I'm still mad we didn't get Skyward sword Link and Zelda
ok I was only mad after playing SS like a month ago but still
I don't care if TP ganondorf wouldn't fit anymore I like those 2 designs too much!
Better than the real deal I'm affraid.Whenever you say Calamity Ganon I think of Calamity Jane so I'm imagining a female cowboy Ganon
To be honest...mixed at best. I'm not a fan of that character selection. Only one newcomer? Why bring back every single veteran over so many compelling newcomer choices just because they existed first? Why should seniority be more important than anything else?That kind of brings up a question.
Your reaction.
Smash 4 port.
Has all Smash 4 characters + Inkling + (with moveset altercations/luigification if necessary)+ New Stages.
One new mode.
What do you think?
You thought wrong, considering what makes the two comic book archers notable are the different types of trick arrows they possess (hell, the Death Battle that featured them was basically a contest of whose trick arrows were better). So saying "like Green Arrow/Hawkeye" heavily implies that moreso than the idea of most of their moves being arrow shots.You're missing the point entirely.
I didn't necessarily mean trick arrows. I thought it was pretty clear I meant shooting arrows for most, or at least a heavy portion of, the moveset. You know, as opposed to Link and Pit's single special move, or Kratos in PSASBR where he uses a bow for single move. And even with that said, shooting for normals, Spirit Shackle Neutral Special, and even a stylized version of Leafage as seen in my example set (Smash doesn't always portray Pokémon attacks correctly anyway). Three potential "arrow types" already.
Attacking with wings =/= attacking with a bow.And B is factually incorrect. Decidueye's bow can be used as a weapon, since half of its bow is its wing. Decidueye would definitely have wing attacks for close combat.
When this is how you justify it being an archer fighter, I'm not impressed.And B is factually incorrect. Decidueye's bow can be used as a weapon, since half of its bow is its wing. Decidueye would definitely have wing attacks for close combat.
Yeah I was joking.You have a difficult time telling when someone's joking and when someone's serious it seems.
Also.....
.....this version of Broly originated from a game and has only been in games, so....
SSj3 Broly for Smash Switch!
(I'm still joking, by the way. Figured I'd let you know before you take it seriously again.)
There are so many reasons why that wouldn't really work..... 0_o
It's kind of like saying Mew could be an alternate costume of Mewtwo.
And me neither about Broly, honestly.Yeah I was joking.
I'm not joking about wanting Goku though..