I'm not saying your points are without reason or logic, nor am I saying Wolf isn't going to happen, just that at this juncture it's clear that there's often a fair bit of dissonance between logical argumentation and actual outcome. People amend the history of Smash speculation to make it seem like things that didn't happen weren't argued for perfectly logically. We've already seen this with Wolf as DLC. There were good reasons to expect him, and good arguments for why he'd show up, but he didn't. Might that happen again? Yeah, it's totally possible.Bad pun aside, the fact that Star Fox Zero kept getting pushed back is probably why Wolf didn't show up(if it did get released on time, he'd probably be among DLC or the original regular cast). This is no longer an issue this time around. He's far more likely now that the only thing keeping him away is gone.
Likewise, Sakurai did say he had a very specific set of reasons for what vets he chose. He can do similar things again, one Melee, one Brawl vet, if he wanted to(or Bamco can set it up that way. We know little about the development or even who is in charge of Smash Switch outside of a rumor), that is.
This is also a different situation from Smash 4. Two of the most popular cut vets are being called out for being gone. Despite the logical reasons for both not being there this time, that doesn't matter to many fans. However, neither reason really is relevant anymore. It's a game that is going to be released quite a long time from now. There's no 3DS version. The key reason for IC's being gone is irrelevant. Wolf's latest game entry is out. He's still being called out as a horrid cut. They know people heavily want him back(some of it due to being a fairly unique character, others cause he was popular in general, and some cause they're Star Fox fans. Many reasons overall, and probably others I didn't think of).
If not clear, I think both are very likely to come back due to what I said, but that's assuming it's an enhanced port. If it's an all new game, this stuff doesn't matter either.
All I'm saying is that if I've learned anything, it's to not be so definitive about roster predictions. It seems irreflective to think otherwise. Even with ostensibly sound logic. Wolf might happen, he might not. I don't know, you don't know, and I'm content waiting until I find out. That's why I'm open to idea of Elma, who in the past I'd have argued against, because I don't think she's going to happen, but there's a chance, sure. So now I'm just going to wait and see. But to me tweaking arguments that already didn't pan out just seems cyclical and futile. His situation, to me, has not changed nearly as much as ICs or Inklings.
I'm not saying your points are without sense, I'm just explaining why I believe what I believe, and why points with sense aren't really going to change my opinion much on this kinda thing.