I like how many of the posters in this thread assume I think wario sucks.
I think most people here know very well the debate's not about top vs bottom, it's about the degree to which Wario's lack of reach handicaps him. Let's ignore guys like Drezel k? (sorry Drezel)
I think he's middle too but I'm sick of how many people think this game is perfectly balanced or some ****.
Yeah, here's proof you don't think Wario sucks, and that's cool. But nobody in this topic ever said that this game was "perfectly balanced". You're the guy assuming here.
Considering gdorf is retardedly slow, cf sucks, and yoshi only really has bair, no ****.
An important point is that *most* characters got 6:4, and I was saying this bodes quite well since I thought Wario would get 7:3 or worse.
"oh wow someone said this, it's the truth!!!"
1) E. Lord is credible in my eyes.
2) I said "maybe, just maybe", as in, I don't take someone else's saying for absolute truth. Stop "quoting" us with things we never said, then dissing said quote.
If you actually read the posts instead of clicking "reply" in a teary-eyed rage then maybe you would have seen my point that he just isn't as good as you give him credit for. There's a ****ing difference *****es.
Teary-eyed rage? Again with your made-up scenarios.
Shield pressure: If the opponent has any intelligence at all they shouldn't be that close to you anyway since jump back with an aerial beats anything wario does. If he bites he stops following them, and his aerials don't have enough reach. The fact that you have to outplay your opponent in the shield scenario shows that you are overrating him. If they see you going past them they shouldn't roll towards you anyway, when they get crossed up they should be rolling AWAY from you.
Yeah, the sword users really have an advantage. But we already knew this a long time ago.
As for Wario staying close to the opponent, I think he's got what it takes to do so... but we already went through this, and somebody just talked about Wario's air dodge and the number of frames it has. It's all about how well Wario can deal with reach. Yeah, I know, no ****, but I wanted to put things back in perspective.
Understand me here: your arguments are valid, and it's not that I don't take them in consideration, it's just that some other people made valid points too in favor of Wario, and I saw so much vids of Wario owning other characters, that I can't help but think that it wasn't just the player's skill making him win, even against swordies.
In other words, Wario, middle tier? Yeah, maybe, but because of the points that I already mentionned (we went back and forth through this), plus the points that other people, including 3GOD, made, *plus* because of matches I saw,
*even though I know those aren't objective at all*, I don't think it's impossible for Wario to be high-mid or even low-high.
Edit: right, Marco got a point.
Edit2:
That's natural when you refute a point with facts but they just repeat "but...but...aerial mobility!!!"
Right, another made-up quote. **** this ****.
I was insisting on aerial mobility because the debate started when someone said Wario's lack of ground speed handicapped him. So obviously, air speed was the answer. I also insisted on it because it's one of his best assets, *and* I talked about some other moves as well that worked *in combination* with said air mobility.
I will repeat it now: I *never* saw air mobility as an end-all to every problem. Ever.