I know. :3Oh, man. That Haruhi Suzumiya one. So good.
And yeah, we should play sometime. What's your PSN?
My PSN is WerekillV. I'll probably play against you tomorrow; I'm tired, and I need to practice a bit.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I know. :3Oh, man. That Haruhi Suzumiya one. So good.
And yeah, we should play sometime. What's your PSN?
I think the tier list is close to how I pictured it. However, I feel that Ragna should be high a bit higher. But seeing how Lambda's only higher because of slightly higher point differences on low tier, Ragna's placement sounds about right. I wonder where Japan has everyone ranked at.Despite its name, top American players worked on the chart.
I'd say learn her for fun and then use her for reals when the balance patch hits if she ends up lower.Dang, if Taokaka is really THAT good, I guess I'm gonna have to drop her.
Him having no bad matchups is strange. I don't think he goes even if Litchi and Bang.Better question: how is he not?
Whoops. Guess I thought she was secondary status or something for you.I already use Taokaka, actually. She's my main.
lol I'll never understand this logic ever. Even when the reason is there.Dang, if Taokaka is really THAT good, I guess I'm gonna have to drop her.
I think Ragna probably dropped just for the simple fact that he gets pushed around by characters who do decent damage/mixup (Bang, Litchi), those that have better mobility (Hazama, Tao), and those than can play a pretty safe game by outzoning him (Hakumen, Lambda).I'm more curious about the Ragna drop, and at how Arakune isn't higher. I swear he should be a lot higher than that.
I disagree. Lambda has always been sleeper mid to high tier imo. And if you've played against a really good Lambda, you would probably disagree too.Lambda isn't nearly that good...
True enough.I disagree with a decent bit of that tier list, but my apathy over it wins out. I don't understand what that 'diff' column is for.
Also I have not heard of some of the players listed that helped with the list. And keep in mind fighting game players are generally notorious for thinking the character they play is worse than they actually are.
I'm also pretty sure that Raven was pointing the other way before.
Dat 5D. :3cI think the list is fairly good, the matchup number might be a bit off in some cases, but I think the ordering of the characters is fine for the most part
I always thought Noel would be higher, but that might be because Lythium wrecks me every time we play.
Obviously it's highly situational dependent and character dependent. But in general you should zone/annoy (run away if you have life lead and time is getting low, but in general running away doesn't get you much unless your opponent is impatient) with them and then rushdown when you can set it up to lock them in place with 236D.Also, Mu question: Should I mostly try to rushdown with Steins or run away all day with them? Or perhaps her playstyle is flexible enough to allow either?
I don't like playing High Tier characters.lol I'll never understand this logic ever. Even when the reason is there.
Well, I get it, but at the same time I don't agree with it for the following reason.I don't like playing High Tier characters.
What train of logic don't you understand?