Oasis_S
Smash Legend
Oasis_Scaled down?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You did a good job. Your approach to the design is smart. But that doesn't feel like Ridley to me. It feels like some kind of underling that Ridley might have.Y'KNOW, I'm curious Mr. Lange, what do you think of my Ridley design:
I kind of just threw the wings on there pretty quickly, but they wouldn't be part of his hurtbox so I didn't care that much. They should be a bit bigger since even Charizard's are bigger than his. Anyway, his body faces forward mostly, reducing his overall length. This allows his neck to appear scrunched up in a way that also keeps his head closer to his body. His head would also still be visible whether facing left or right. Overall his hurtbox remains in a pretty clear area. His tail is short like in Super Metroid, but not only has it appeared "stretchy" before in Metroid games, Smash is no stranger to using exaggerated animations like that to compensate. Speaking of Smash's exaggerated animations, his wings would also appear larger as they flapped, I imagine.
I made rather strict rules for myself for his size. He couldn't be taller than Bowser overall, the top of his head couldn't go over Ganondorf's, and he had to be at least eye level with Samus. He could stand to be a bit bigger, if that was really necessary. Maybe 10, 15%.
I tried to portray him as rather bestial, since that is apparently how Sakurai seems to view him, though I probably should have made his arms and hands in a more "ready to attack" stance. I figure Ridley's walk would have him, y'know, walking, and I think this stance would transition well enough into that kind of animation (and of course going into a flying dash shouldn't be a problem), but if he ends up galloping or crawling on all-fours then that stance probably wouldn't work.
So yeah, honestly, is it terrible, does it not work for him, what. OF COURSE OTHERS CAN COMMENT ON IT TO, been a while since I've brought it up and I think putting it in the collapse tag probably kept some people from ever seeing it.
I know all of that. I was doing none of the things you are accusing me of. The fact that you think this leads me to believe my posts were deliberately ignored, due to the bias of others. How many times have I said "Most arguments here have been really good" or, in response to someone, "that's a good point"? I said my arguments were good, but I never said my arguments were better than others. I said we all have good points to make. It was when others were saying I had no logic and poor arguments that I defended what I said, because I do use logic and my arguments are not bad. Apparently that equates to "me thinking I'm the only person whose right"? I argue aggressively, but that's not the same thing as being hostile or trying to dominate.Mr. Lange, you really need to exercise some humility in your posts.
Would it hurt to recognize that others may not see things your way? Not in terms of right and wrong, but in varying angles of the discussion. Not everything you're arguing can be solid fact. In fact, this is the kind of debate that relies on speculations and theories and mostly anecdotal evidence. Not that there isn't facts and hard evidence to consider, but the point is you have to be careful in how you regard your own arguments. This constant dismissal of other people's interpretations and replies causes you to look hostile in your efforts to make solid arguments. Believing your own arguments to be exceptional creates arrogance and further encourages dismissing other replies. Interpretation runs high in these considerations of a game character's role, so you should try to bear with other people if they see things from a different perspective.
Your goal should be to present your perspective, back it up, and just see what other people come up with. Try not to narrow the possible range of responses. If the response you receive seems to curve away from your point, address their argument anyway and steer it back to your primary point. Or consider that the response comes from a different perspective.
I have to say that's probably the only way they could get away with including Ridley. If anything they would use that excuse if they add him.New counter argument for Ridley.
So Bowser uses magic at different instances in the Mario series. Ridley has been cloned how many times?
We could just say the Ridley in Smash is a smaller clone
What? Wario Land 3 is my favorite, by far. But yeah, we seem to be in the same boat xD.Pleased to meet you, I'm Wariofan1. I don't main, and hardly even alt Wario anymore. He was not my most anticipated character for Brawl, he isn't my favorite Nintendo character, I haven't played a WarioWare game in years, and the only Wario games I enjoy these days are Wario Land 2 and Wario Land: Shake Dimension. But as you can still read, I am obviously still the #1 Wario fan, because my name says so.
I swear, this is the forum I'm the most active on recently, and it's the last place I have this dreaded name, and I have no idea why I even have it since I had dropped the name a long time ago in 2010, which is my sign up date. It kind of gives off the wrong impression of me, I'd much rather be named something that actually has to do with my Smash Bros activity, but nope, stuck with this hell of a name.
I guess we all have our embarrasing childhood online names.
It is, I'll give you that. Didn't Gyspy do that too? I've always liked unique names. I was *this* close to being named Cosmo. Got a boring old bible name instead. Now I'm one of 6 Daniels on my floor. such is life xD.Also went with my real name as a username.~ It was unique sounding enough already.
Honestly, other than the melee trailer, this is the best bit of argument I can think of. The trailer for Smash 64 sums it all up pretty nicely. I do love the 'ol Master hand and his collection of dolls. I can see him pulling a Ridley doll outta the chest and hurling him onto final destination. Actually, it's so awesome I'm getting chills...The canon is that there are a bunch of dolls and trophies of famous Nintendo characters coming together to fight.
my mom almost names me Kenji or Ashkon because she wanted a unique name but my name is even less common than both of thoseIt is, I'll give you that. Didn't Gyspy do that too? I've always liked unique names. I was *this* close to being named Cosmo. Got a boring old bible name instead. Now I'm one of 6 Daniels on my floor. such is life xD.
Just throw in a bit about Ridley at the end you'll be fine. While there isn't any serious arguing going on it's fine for Ridley's harem to discuss slightly not ridley things, as long as ridlet things are being discussed at the same time. It's a thin line, you learn to dance around it.my mom almost names me Kenji or Ashkon because she wanted a unique name but my name is even less common than both of those
Edit: wrong thread for that question opps
ya it would be pretty easy to give him a move setJust throw in a bit about Ridley at the end you'll be fine. While there isn't any serious arguing going on it's fine for Ridley's harem to discuss slightly not ridley things, as long as ridlet things are being discussed at the same time. It's a thin line, you learn to dance around it.
Personally, I'll be happy as long as Ridley gets some kind of tail attack. His jab combo, a throw, dash attack, whatever, as long as he maims with it somehow, I'll be happy.
I like to think his final smash would be something like the Dragoon, except instead of just knocking them away, he'd grab them with his talons, and then you'd see them falling off in the distance. Maybe you get 3 goes at it, or one per enemy. I dislike the space pirate ideas, just imo.ya it would be pretty easy to give him a move set
his final smash could be I don't know more fireballs than usual
I also disagree with the space pirates. I'd be ashamed of them if they did a Palutena final smash sort of thing with a space pirate raid. That isn't his style, he just litters the ****ers all over stages and when he's confronted he fights very one on one.I like to think his final smash would be something like the Dragoon, except instead of just knocking them away, he'd grab them with his talons, and then you'd see them falling off in the distance. Maybe you get 3 goes at it, or one per enemy. I dislike the space pirate ideas, just imo.
I don't really remember much about Gypsy (other than the picture incident), but even then I always assumed that was him being...well, him.It is, I'll give you that. Didn't Gyspy do that too? I've always liked unique names. I was *this* close to being named Cosmo. Got a boring old bible name instead. Now I'm one of 6 Daniels on my floor. such is life xD.
I live to please and dance for Mistress Ridlette.as long as ridlet things are being discussed at the same time. It's a thin line, you learn to dance around it.
I still stand by my thought of Kraid wrecking stuff from the backgroundI also disagree with the space pirates. I'd be ashamed of them if they did a Palutena final smash sort of thing with a space pirate raid. That isn't his style, he just litters the ****ers all over stages and when he's confronted he fights very one on one.
Now that this has been brought up I realize just how difficult it has been to come up with a final smash for Ridley.
The only thing that does come to mind is his Super Metroid zoom-in-from-the-background attack (as seen in Brawl, and Master Hand does this as well), or in other words the reverse Dragoon. But doesn't Ridley have anything more outstanding than that? Something must exist that would make for a fitting final smash for him that isn't so standard.
Well that just gave me an idea. If Samus can materialize her armor back together in a big vortex magnet thing, Ridley could transform into Meta Ridley in the same fashion. The parts materializing and attaching to him for a transformation type of final smash like Giga Bowser.That all said, I also have no idea what would be "him" as far as Final Smash is concerned. I imagined the Meta/Omega forme back in the day, and can kind of see the generic fireball-clearing-out-the-stage attack or wall-dragging-grab from Other M/DoA Dimensions. If anything I'd also imagine that "dark" armor from the Other M fight would also work in a pseudo-Giga Bowser way.
Yeah I agree Ridley's final smash needs to be all up in your face. Maybe something Ike or linky where if he gets ya he rips you a new one. Maybe he'd impale you with his tail and drag you across the stage a bit. hehe.I also disagree with the space pirates. I'd be ashamed of them if they did a Palutena final smash sort of thing with a space pirate raid. That isn't his style, he just litters the ****ers all over stages and when he's confronted he fights very one on one.
Now that this has been brought up I realize just how difficult it has been to come up with a final smash for Ridley.
The only thing that does come to mind is his Super Metroid zoom-in-from-the-background attack (as seen in Brawl, and Master Hand does this as well), or in other words the reverse Dragoon. But doesn't Ridley have anything more outstanding than that? Something must exist that would make for a fitting final smash for him that isn't so standard.
And here I am complaining about the name Daniel. To be fair, I don't dislike it. I just name all my vijeogame avatars cosmo instead xD. Sounds more... grand?I don't really remember much about Gypsy (other than the picture incident), but even then I always assumed that was him being...well, him.
And that's unfortunate (I guess. I like Daniel~). I actually just barely edged out all my siblings, bar my older sister who apparently disappeared from existence (in fact, as far as my parents are concerned, they had no daughter until my little sister was born), for the unique name thing. To the point where I couldn't even pronounce it myself as a youngin' so I ended up taking a nickname anyway. As it turns out I'm only known by the name here.
Life is funny like that.
That all said, I also have no idea what would be "him" as far as Final Smash is concerned. I imagined the Meta/Omega forme back in the day, and can kind of see the generic fireball-clearing-out-the-stage attack or wall-dragging-grab from Other M/DoA Dimensions. If anything I'd also imagine that "dark" armor from the Other M fight would also work in a pseudo-Giga Bowser way.
I live to please and dance for Mistress Ridlette.
Maybe Ridley pokes your eye out. Like, the player. With his tail. It's 3D, so they can do that. That'd be an effective final smash.The Zooming-into-your-face thing would look pretty good on the 3DS, I imagine.
Comparing Ridley to Waluigi? Why, that's completely...
WHOA OH MY GOD WHAT'S THAT?
Ridley was originally intended to be an Assist Trophy in Brawl, not a boss. He's a versatile character that can fit into whatever role the developers want him in, and if they feel like 'putting their best efforts' into making him playable, as Sakurai said, it could work. And if they don't, it won't...it's that simple.
A bad comparison.I guess Villager is forever doomed to be too peaceful for a fighting game, Little Mac will continue being only an Assist Trophy, Charizard merely to be found in a Pokeball, and King Dedede as a sprite floating in the background.
After all, their fates have already been decided.
No its not. Because none of those listed were previous smashbros bosses who were king kong sized.It's a perfect comparison, lol.
I expect him to be playable, whatever happens to make that work is all part of a process which every character has gone through and is not special to Ridley.
Ridley's size changes all throughout the Metroid and Smash Bros series. A smaller size is not out of the question.No its not. Because none of those listed were previous smashbros bosses who were king kong sized.
He doesn't have a big chance at all. Well when they shrink down Master hand and make him a playable character, then maybe i'd say otherwise.
I just know alot of games tend to keep bosses as bosses.
Nope, and I don't expect Olimar to grow from the size of a quarter either.A bad comparison.
You don't really expect him to change his size do you?
Were they bosses that were king kong sized? of course not.Ridley's size changes all throughout the Metroid and Smash Bros series. A smaller size is not out of the question.
A lot of games tend to keep items as items. Look what happened. Besides, do you know how many games have made previous bosses playable in later installments?
A FRICKEN SH*T TON THATS WHAT!
Regardless of that, I've only seen you in the Krystal and Ridley threads, berating those characters both times. Why are you in a support thread if you don't support the character?
I just know alot of games tend to keep bosses as bosses.
Some are yeah. More than you think.Were they bosses that were king kong sized? of course not.
Charizard wasn't king kong sized when he was a pokeball in Smash Bros 64 :/
Where have i said anything negative about Ridley? Probably in your head.
I don't hate Ridley at all. I'm quite fond of him. Realistically, he doesn't have a chance though. He was in Smash Bros Brawl at the size the Smash Bros team wanted him to be.
Especially Smash Bros, which always solidifies that bosses will always remain bosses and never be playable under any circumstance.
I can appreciate a good argument, but as Mr Lange said, make sure you're not just repeating the same points already being made on prior pages.
Arguing against him isn't exactly positive when the topic of the thread is a support thread for his inclusion of a smash bros title.
Ridley changed size in Brawl three different times. They really don't care that much. Plus, he was small in Melee's opening which is the size the team wanted him to be. Weird...It's like their minds change all the time.