Delusion is concept that is the reverse of rationality, you see.
April Direct was clear, based on context:
- Sakurai talks about Yellow Devil and how he's a boss on Wily Castle.
- He proceeds to say there are more bosses like him.
- He shows footage of Ridley's shadow on the Pyrosphere with a caption saying "Other boss appearances"
Be objective: what is the most logical conclusion you can draw from here?
I'm trying to hold a civil conversation here without gloating or being petty, unlike trolls. I'm blunt, I know, but I favor rational thinking and clear argumentation. Delusion is the opposite of that.
It boggles my mind that, in the face of sheer evidence, people argued the opposite. It's a behavior I cannot understand.
One thing is to hope, another thing is to be deluded to the point of abandoning rationality in an argument. I'm sympathetic to hopeful people, but that is no reason to abandon rationality in a conversation.
Why did people keep hoping? I'll tell you why we kept hoping. And why I still do.
Popular requests, such as Waluigi and Skull Kid, were disconfirmed as playable throughout development. When they were, it was swift, brutal, and left absolutely no room for doubt. Sakurai straight-up said "X character is not playable." Being stuck into the AT role has so far been concrete proof of disconfirmation - if Ridley was an AT and he got disconfirmed in a similar manner as the above examples, this thread would not even be half as big. Based on the way he handled other disconfirmations, he knows that a one-and-done deal is preferable to slowly drawing it out. Why? Because there's no room for false hope. Fake hype is a terrible business strategy, and Nintendo is smart enough to know this.
So if Ridley has been truly disconfirmed... why did they handle it differently? Why, when a potential disconfirmation rolled around, did they instead decide to sort of dance around it and be vague? They never called him out by name until the 50-fact extravaganza. They never even had him on screen until then. Sakurai never said "this character will not be playable." He left room for doubt. This is easily comparable to the Toon Link situation - he showed Toon Link as a stage prop, but never said "not playable." Lo and behold, he found a way to get Toon Link in a dual role. He teased Toon Link, he never truly disconfirmed anything, and that teasing paid off. Toon Link is playable. From the April Direct later on, he teased Palutena with the Pseudo-Palutena trophy. He made people think that she was a trophy, then he faked us out. Guess where Palutena is now?
Looking at it this way, we did some math. Sakurai is teasing this character in an unusual way. But when he's teased characters before, it paid off. Their fans ultimately got their wishes. Couple this with a fact that not many people seem to know - multiple Ridleys exist in Metroid canon. He's been blown up, reassembled, and cloned many times in the series so the devs could continue giving him Joker Immunity. Following previous examples and this, we arrived at the conclusion that Ridley would eventually be revealed as a playable character.
It came down to this: Sakurai's handling of Ridley was completely inconsistent with the ah he handled other disconfirmed characters. It
was consistent with the way he handled characters who became playable. And we trusted Sakurai's judgment. We had confidence in his strategy. And frankly, with DLC confirmed and the idea of dual roles, I still do. But once again, he knows a lot of things that we don't, so there are undoubtedly some factors at play that we're unaware of.
Honestly, I don't see why everyone's acting like Ridley on the Pyrosphere is news. We've known since April that he'd be a stage element, it was just a matter of "how does this stage element work." I also don't see why everyone's acting like he doesn't have a chance either. Past playable characters have had dual roles, and they used multiple incarnations to dance around that. Considering how popular Ridley is (and the fact that they are clearly aware of this)... well, I've already done the math.
Goodness, but I got wordy there.