I already gave you names, Im not gonna sit here and right a book of names. You can ask around and get your answer.
You gave me names of
people you beat in friendlies, not people who call Peach "cheap", who you've managed to get to consider switching to Peach or whose Snakes and Meta-Knights you're "beating the ****" out of it. Am I to assume every single one of the people you named now call Peach "cheap" because of what you did to them, are considering switching to Peach and every single Meta and Snake you mentioned got "the ****" beaten out of them by you?
Also, it's all still
friendlies. I mean, the only thing of note you've
ever done (that you've told us about insofar) is manage to beat
one Snake into losers
once (in a tournament). Umm... wow! Peach is Top Tier!
And Im gonna say no you dont beat average or w/e type of people with high tiers with Peach. And with your typical statement, you make it sound like its so easy. So please do better than me then and prove that I have no skill and only beat high tiers cause people suck.
Wait... what?
Are you saying it's
not easy to beat average players as Peach? Isn't your entire argument that Peach is
pretty good? Which would mean that it should be
quite easy to beat average players as Peach. If it's so friggin' hard, then she's
obviously not all that good.
I have yet to make a reference to your skill as lacking. All I've ever done is speculate that maybe your opponents either suck or just don't have enough familiarity with the matchup. Who knows, maybe your Peach
is quite good, which would explain why you've managed to take her so far.
But it still doesn't change the total of her potential, how good she is you go deeper. Personal skill trumphs Tier Lists and individual matchups. But sometimes, X-player's personal skill has to be
tons better than Y-player's if X player's character is just
that much worse than Y-character's.
Your argument is "Peach is actually quite good". Prove it. Go to tournaments. Do things. Take her far. Until such time, please, stop mouthing off about your prowess as Peach and what you've "done with her so far" and how you're "beating the **** out of Metas and Snakes" when you're not doing
any of those things in tournaments but Online and in friendlies!
And de que diablo with the mango thing. Again with that? You mean to tell me everyone expected him too win that? This I'm gonna leave along. Your to blind to see the point.
Why must it either be "No one saw it coming" or "Everyone saw it coming"? No, everyone didn't see it coming. But some of us weren't surprised and some of us understand why and how Mango could win. Because
Jigglypuff is actually quite good and capable of winning tournaments. No one expected a Jigglypuff to take a major tournament because there just were so darn few of them around compared to the Sheiks, Marths, Fox and Falcos.
But many of us knew that Jigglypuff could win and we weren't surprised that a Jigglypuff won because she was Jigglypuff. The only surprise came from the fact that there just aren't that many good ones out there.
Please read what other people write once in while because
I've said these exact things already, yet you
completely disregard them and
make up bovine manure I never said into order to "refute" it.
It's nice to see your argumentation style hasn't change in the past few months. Instead of presenting real arguments, you ignore what people are saying and make up entirely new stuff. You also present tons of invalid arguments and when called on it ignore it or try to change the subject. Most of the time, you don't even bother reading what other people write, even when you don't disagree with them.
You'll grasp at anything to "win" the argument. Instead of going after their facts and their arguments, you'll try to find small flaws that really don't matter or
entirely rewrite what they say to "counter" it with irrelevant arguments. You even misuse other people's posts to support your own, like when you quote Kidd
saying he agreed with me and used it as proof as how I just "got my behind handed to me".
You're also quite a skilled employer of the Strawman's argument. I will sometimes do this by mistake when I misread posts when I skim them, but you've made it into an art. You do it in virtually every single post you write, like when you equated me saying "Some of use weren't surprised a Jigglypuff managed to win a major tournament because it was Jigglypuff because we knew Jigglypuff had the potential to win tournaments" as me saying "
Everyone saw Mango taking Pound 3 coming!".
Um... yeah, no. That is not good debating.
Also I noticed where I started somthing. When I say I beat the **** out of snake and meta. This one I'll be a man and take the blame for. It was just an expression.
Or rather a
blatant lie. Or at least
heavy exaggeration. And then when I called you on it, you acted offended and as if I'd just made it up.
Who does not feel good at one point beating a high tier with a under used character.
"Wow, I managed to beat this High Tier with my Low Tier
in a friendly! Praised be I!".
You kept bringing it up so it got me thinking. Tuff and skilled metas I dont beat the **** out of. But I have beaten them.
How many Metas have you beaten and how many Metas
have beaten you? How many Metas have
beaten the **** out of you? Also,
how many tough and skilled Metas have you beaten in tournaments?
Going from what you've said insofar, your
only feat in Brawl is to have
once managed to beat
one Snake player in the Winner's Bracket (but he eventually came back and won the entire tournament or whatever).
Same as for other characters that are up there. And I have gave you names of those people. And I know I said before that I lose to them as will. I pointed out that It goes even.
In
friendlies. I've
already told you that
friendlies do not count for
anything, least of all "proof of that my Low Tier is good". Come back to me once you've beaten a lot of really good people using High Tiers
in tournaments.
And For Ankoku comment, I dont care about. I got annoy of you saying it and hype yuna up even more.
Ankoku agreed with me. Which means Ankoku thinks what I said (that specific thing) was right. Wow, I guess that was bad of him. Bad Ankoku! How
dare he
ever agree with something
youb don't agree with.
Also, see the pattern here. Ankoku agrees with what I'm saying. He doesn't agree with what
you're saying.
Im getting infraction or w/e dealing with this kid and people who support him. So I'm gonna end this now.
Some of us can be acerbic, sarcastic and heaten
without getting infractions. In fact, I've received
zero infractions for language. I've received two infractions (with a lot of time between them) for "minor spam" once for reposting a big facepalm picture and calling for others to do the same (not so smart) and once for "replying to SPAM" for replying in a stupid thread (and that one was yellow, hence, not a "real" infraction - 0 points).
Yet
not once for language, flaming, what I said, whatever. Because some of us are capable of debating without resorting to flames, personal insults and expletives.
Im getting infraction or w/e dealing with this kid and people who support him. So I'm gonna end this now. I'm gonna prove everyone wrong and as time passes, people will see Peach different. Until then keep the talk about how she is alive. Cause Im gonna enjoy crushing. Let it be known!
Future tense.
You have yet to prove anything with Peach. Managing to place 9th and 10th in two local tournaments don't establish anything. Managing to beat
one single Snake in a single tournament doesn't really prove anything, either.
Prove that Peach is good. Be my guest. I'm not gonna try and stop you. I won't even
mind if you
actually succeed. But
until you prove it,
stop talking as if you've already proven it.
Until such time you prove Peach good,
what I've said about Peach's potential still stands (because they're, you know, fact based).