Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
we're talking about bad wii games
It wasn't "bad", it just wasn't as good as the one on the N64.
I should have been more specific with my previous post. I was being lazy. XD Your definitely right as to why I don't care for the Wii version as much. I enjoy the N64 title a lot. Even now I still play it quite a bit.
The one on the N64 was horrible. And really, I appreciate the local multiplayer options on the Wiimake but I do agree that it's pretty much a CoD clone.
Are you joking me? It's one of the greatest games of all time! (In my opinion, of course.)
Sure, it was great back in the N64 days but it has a horrible frame rate, controls terribly, is directionless, has sloppy combat and aged about as well as milk in the sun.
It's a shame, really, Halo is better.
Horrible frame rate? What? If we were talking about Perfect Dark 64, then I'd agree but I don't see any drop in frame rate when I play the game every once in a while.
My word against yours, I see it.
C-buttons ARE NOT a good replacement for a second control stick.
Dropping you into the middle of nowhere with vague objectives and telling you good luck is pretty directionless to me.
When you play Goldeneye it doesn't feel like you're intentionally aiming with precision to take out targets, it feels like you're pointing your gun in the baddies' general direction and firing.
Back from '98. The game doesn't hold up well.
Fair enough.
They're good for strafing and moving around faster...the N64 controller was perfect for shooters back in the 90's.
How are you dropped in the middle of nowhere? And at least you can do the objectives in any order you wish instead of today's linear games. (Do objectives in this order...A...B...C etc.)
You've been spoiled with today's games with regenerating health and massive auto aim. This is why today's games have been dumbed down for the general audience.
So? Not that many games back then got scores that high.
Yes, that was back in the 90s and this is the 10s. Two sticks work better compared to one stick and a d-pad, even for the borderline uncontrollable speed of 90s shooters.
I think the mission that comes to mind the most is the one where they just drop you into a massive snowfield and just kind of say "good luck." Although I will admit the ability to complete objectives in any order is something I miss.
Now that's just insulting. And where did I even mention health? I was talking about aiming, besides, adding regenerating health and chopping out 70% of the character customization from Mass Effect 2 to make it more off a shooter than an RPG is dumbing something down. Improving aiming mechanics so you can actually shoot what you want to shoot is not.
Keep telling yourself that.
I can agree with that.
Oh yeah, I remember that mission. You actually play it twice. (Once in the daytime and another time in the night.)
Sorry about that, I just meant that today's gamers are spoiled and don't appreciate older games. Games have gotten easier.
Damn, LoZ OoT got 99? And I simply meant that you really don't see games this generation that get scores of 96. Even the best games today get in the early scores of 90s.
Yeah, the other missions weren't bad.
Demon's Souls would like to have a word with you. Other than that, yeah I will admit that games are easier. But I'm okay with that because it lets me play many different games over a short period of time rather than just one game over a long period of time. Plus when I was a kid a game could have insane difficultly because I had all the time in the world to get good at the game or to wander around enough until I stumble upon what I'm supposed to do next. These days I just don't have that much time, and given that games are targeted at people between the ages of 17-35ish is why games are easier these days.
I think the reason why is because the mid-late 90s was an era of mind-blowing change that got people to hand out high scores like candy. In think that carried over into the following generations which is why an "average" game is 7-8/10.
Agree with both. (At the very least, the Gamecube controller is better suited than the Xbox's).
Yep, it's supposed to be more powerful than either the PS3 or Xbox 360 (not surprising at this point, both systems are at or near 5 years old, each), have DLC, GC, Wii, and Blu-Ray capability, and the controller is speculated to have:
