GwJ
Smash Hero
It always happens -_-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is RIDDLED with inaccuracies, man. Before you even try to argue you really should quit callin' the kettle black here on assumptions.Also there's something wrong with your scenario, besides the obvious huge conditions lol. Why would anyone fiendish after you've already equipped? Fiendish doesnt stop you from activating Hornet's ability to send to grave and pop, which would be fiendish, which allows for you to hit activate Hornet's effect. In that case your opponent would then have to chain Veiler to hornet's eff, effectively not letting him go plus at all.
Also Macro Cosmos doesnt effect Inzektors because when an inzektor is equipped, it doesnt count as a monster, it counts as a spell, so it still goes to grave.
That's just straight up silly. Economics do work that way, but don't think for a second Konami doesn't know this. They intentionally manipulate the rarities of cards that they determine to test well in the OCG for TCG audiences to make oodles and oodles of money, and reprint the packs down the line after seeing how well certain product has sold and for what cards for even extra cash. This is just good business. But the game will be over this way sooner or later.Also, Konami does not determine the pricing of cards. This is generated by supply and demand. Konami provides all cards in booster packs, which come at set pricing.
Inzektor rulings have always been the absolute worst. My buddy plays Inzektor sword Zekalibur and it was ruled that if he has a dragonfly equipped with both hornet and sword and then uses hornet to pop sword, dragonfly gets it's effect twice, despite the fact that that would mean Dragonfly would activate twice in the same chain.I think his point was that Inzektors are the easiest to side against vs the big 3 at this moment. Though I don't really think that's a good justification... he could just say he likes to play the deck. I mean, we all play what we like and we all play what we need to win, if those both coincide then good on ya.
The Inzektor ruling has been tossed up and down and slapped around, but as of now even the judge forum is ruling that it drops off. Unless Fiendish and Effect Veiler work with different mechanics in how they negate, then I don't see why Hornet wouldn't drop off of a Fiendish if it does off of Veiler.
No, his first mistake was playing a Sophia deck (...I play Sophia decks too ). His LAST mistake was you having Future Fusion in opening hand playing dragons.He passed first turn, that was his first, and last mistake
It works, and is common knowledge and the basis for an OTK strategy that they use. I'm sure Pierce can give you the specifics on how it works, because I sure as hell don't feel like looking it up to explain it. Just know that the chain builds correctly and Yu-Gi-Oh! Game mechanics are too complicated for it's own good.Inzektor rulings have always been the absolute worst. My buddy plays Inzektor sword Zekalibur and it was ruled that if he has a dragonfly equipped with both hornet and sword and then uses hornet to pop sword, dragonfly gets it's effect twice, despite the fact that that would mean Dragonfly would activate twice in the same chain.
The reasoning we were given? "Oh, it just works that way"
Despite not working that way for everything else ever.
loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool that post >This thread is > pojo.
I got banned from DGZ way back for a fricking hilarious post.
Wait wait wait.get 3 dragon collide structure decks
or 3 Dark World ones.
Cna't really go wrong with those
SporT my KankeR
A bit late on that, chap. >_>If an Inzektor's effect is negated, it loses the ability to hold a monster equipped to it by the effect of the Inzektor.