Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Umm what?Id rather they get a stage or trophy. I mean mii gunner and splatoon costume, pretend the moves are paint and boom you have a inkling
I'd be good with that, actually, I think I'd like it more since splatoon gets more content but they can still let the franchise do it's own thing for a little while before actually adding a characterSo, a question for both Inklings defenders and Inklings detractors: would you be okay if Inklings didn't make it but they got some DLC presence, like more trophies, a stage and some songs (or even an Assist Trophy)?
It goes without saying that a DLC character would be best, but I would be pretty happy if we got a traveling stage around Inkopolis (which would naturally come with music). I'm not too optimistic of that happening though, all of the stages we've gotten as DLC so far have either been ported from a past game or has been very easy to implement (Mario Maker).So, a question for both Inklings defenders and Inklings detractors: would you be okay if Inklings didn't make it but they got some DLC presence, like more trophies, a stage and some songs (or even an Assist Trophy)?
That's your argument? Not that the inklings could have an expansive moveset just that you want their ink to be ink? Also that is a kinda horrible comparison considering one is life and one is a video game. People really do have to pretend the cardboard box is a homeUmm what?
So people who want Inklings have to "pretend" that the lasers are ink?
That's like saying get a cardboard box and pretend it's a house, you won't have to worry about living in the streets anymore.
AT-no. I dont use themSo, a question for both Inklings defenders and Inklings detractors: would you be okay if Inklings didn't make it but they got some DLC presence, like more trophies, a stage and some songs (or even an Assist Trophy)?
I mean, Inkling is one of my most-wanted characters, so I would be disappointed. A stage would be cool, I guess.So, a question for both Inklings defenders and Inklings detractors: would you be okay if Inklings didn't make it but they got some DLC presence, like more trophies, a stage and some songs (or even an Assist Trophy)?
I'm aware of people actually living in cardboard boxes.That's your argument? Not that the inklings could have an expansive moveset just that you want their ink to be ink? Also that is a kinda horrible comparison considering one is life and one is a video game. People really do have to pretend the cardboard box is a home
My statement was clearly a joke though not my argument for them not being in. My argument is that there are still veteran Nintendo characters with no rep. Inklings are brand new and have a successful game that is still being updated. Where as some of these veteran games are done.I'm aware of people actually living in cardboard boxes.
However, your argument about the Inklings is pretty bad, especially by saying "pretend the moves are paint and boom you have a inkling".
Really, the only thing stopping the Inklings is technical limitations of the 3DS. I don't think it would be possible swimming through colored ink on Battlefield.
Also, they may be Mii costumes now so I know it doesn't do the character justice, look at K.rool, he is not flexible like how his costume is. I'm not saying to change their specific attacks to be Ink instead of lasers but it's foolish to say "pretend that they're ink" we have a ballot with no limits of who to vote for.
It's only natural that people want them in.
I feel like that's an argument against yourself. "Let's promote these oldies with no apparent future instead of our new, popular characters who we really want to capitalize on!!"My statement was clearly a joke though not my argument for them not being in. My argument is that there are still veteran Nintendo characters with no rep. Inklings are brand new and have a successful game that is still being updated. Where as some of these veteran games are done.
A sensible first post. Welcome to SmashBoardsWhether or not you like the Inklings there is no denying that at this point they do have a strong chance of making it in (or at least a somewhat decent one). For the sake of the thread I suggest we just move on. It's getting pretty tiring.
Can you clarify? That literally made no sense to me, are you saying characters should be added to try and revive an old series?The oldies are Fan favorites. People love ness but yet the creator of earthbound said he will never make another Mother game so hes immortalized in smash. There are old games the fans want but creators may not want to or cant get another game yet so they should be in smash. Nice try though I guess
Thanks, but I've been lurking for awhile; finally made an account because I was tired of reading about Inklings.A sensible first post. Welcome to SmashBoards
Who was denying it?Whether or not you like the Inklings there is no denying that at this point they do have a strong chance of making it in (or at least a somewhat decent one). For the sake of the thread I suggest we just move on. It's getting pretty tiring.
Marty and Ike are both recurring characters.I'm going to step away from the Ice Climber comparison as the ICs were in Melee for a vastly different reason than Marth or Roy. Marth and Roy are closer in concept to Ness (who, by the premise of being in Smash 64, was considered an "iconic character").
pupNapoleon Which FE reps would you remove from the Smash Roster if you could? I see where you're coming from with the "too many Fire Emblem reps", but I'm not sure which characters you genuinely find reasonable additions. Should only Marth be put in the game?
Edit: I may be several hours late with this post. Gonna post Inkling thoughts later.
Ness was in Smash before his franchise was dead. He's been a veteran since the very first installment of Smash. You're saying characters should be newly added that are already dead. Unless the character is an absolute legend that young and old players know, that would be a pretty lame business decision.The oldies are Fan favorites. People love ness but yet the creator of earthbound said he will never make another Mother game so hes immortalized in smash. There are old games the fans want but creators may not want to or cant get another game yet so they should be in smash. Nice try though I guess
Oh yeah, how could I forget her. Sorry.Along with somebody else on the roster.
I'll give you a hint. Her name starts with "Zel" and ends with "da".
Well I'am very neutral on Snake. While I don't really expect him to be back, I still think he had a chance. Well who knows? Maybe he will become the next . Well, you know, everybody think that he is never coming back because he doesn't have any new games coming up. However despite all of that, he still return. I still yet to try him, so just because characters like and who had a game only on PC and PS4 coming next year doesn't mean you need a new game to get in Smash. It doesn't really matter anyway. That argument is pretty much pointless anyway.My my, even in a new location this thread is more or less the same as it always was.
- - - -
It's probably going to be Wolf or a newcomer. I don't want to count Snake out, but I'm iffy on how much of a popular choice on the ballot he could have been. I love Snake, but there are many people who still think he's "not Nintendo enough" when he's already been in a Smash Brothers game lol.
also can we not include like 20 large pictures in a spoiler tab for no reason in the future pls
it's super unnecessary and technically just added spam to a nice post
thank
Personally I don't think Snake will come back because I think they're done with the veterans since they already had 3 DLC characters () that were all veterans. But then again i'm just going off of what we have which is very little.Well I'am very neutral on Snake. While I don't really expect him to be back, I still think he had a chance. Well who knows? Maybe he will become the next . Well, you know, everybody think that he is never coming back.
Kind of like-I don't think Lucas' rope snake with Prince Sable is a hint or a reference to Snake the character. I think it's a visual gag, as all the trailers include a lot of them. There are references to the game itself, but sometimes the scene is just suppose to make you smile.
Yea, I do agree that it is just a gag. I just though this to myself that this was a reference, but I just think they just make this for fun. That's it. Sorry for mistaking it for a reference. But anyway, I just glad that we don't know what the next characters going to be because we all want to be surprise.I don't think Lucas' rope snake with Prince Sable is a hint or a reference to Snake the character. I think it's a visual gag, as all the trailers include a lot of them. There are references to the game itself, but sometimes the scene is just suppose to make you smile.
Great, people overrating Shovel Knight in terms of his significance to Nintendo. If any third-party franchise is getting heavily pushed by Nintendo, it's obviously Yo-Kai Watch and yet I don't see tons of people saying Jibanyan is likely because of that despite Yo-Kai Watch being a much bigger franchise over in Japan than Shovel Knight is anywhere. Shove Knight getting an amiibo (one that Yatch Club themself produced and Nintendo merely licensed) no longer means anything consideirng it's confirmed that any indie character can have an amiibo made for them.Source Gaming recently did a roundtable with reactions to the Smash/Nintendo rumors. Includes opinions from @Neo Zero and Tamaki. I know you guys talk about Inklings/ Shovel Knight a lot so I figured I should give you guys a heads up.
Thing with Shovel Knight is, he was extremely popular in the ballot, especially in the casual crowd. Nintendo obviously sees the demand for him, and they also happen to have a good relationship with his creator.Great, people overrating Shovel Knight in terms of his significance to Nintendo. If any third-party franchise is getting heavily pushed by Nintendo, it's obviously Yo-Kai Watch and yet I don't see tons of people saying Jibanyan is likely because of that despite Yo-Kai Watch being a much bigger franchise over in Japan than Shovel Knight is anywhere. Shove Knight getting an amiibo (one that Yatch Club themself produced and Nintendo merely licensed) no longer means anything consideirng it's confirmed that any indie character can have an amiibo made for them.
Care to elaborate?You know who else are popular? Especially amongst the casual crowd?
Nintendo characters from Nintendo franchises that already proven to have staying power while Shovel Knight didn't even break 800k.
Shovel Knight has been highly requested since the beginning of the ballot, long before any "leaks" occurred. The leaks did revamp his popularity, sure, but he always did fairly well on Internet polls, especially those not heavily rooted in the Smash community.Where is this perceive popularity coming from? Because from what I've seen, it's just confirmation bias thanks to those dumb rumors.
And yes relevancy to Nintendo does matter? Why would Nintendo pay the licensing fees for a character who may not be around seven years from now when they can use their own characters who are much popular? Sonic/Mega Man tier Shovel Knight is not.
Why? Hope you don't mind asking but I'm kinda curious. :3I could see Shovel Knight happening, though I'm mostly indifferent to him.
Haven't played the game so I can't say I'd be against or in favor of him, really.
Actually staying power was referring to the franchises. Even the dead ones like F-Zero had more games than Shovel Knight.I believe the kind of "Nintendo characters with staying power" he is referring to are the DK duo and Wolf (Ice Climbers also qualify, but they are not feasible as 3DS DLC)
Ballot popularity.Why? Hope you don't mind asking but I'm kinda curious. :3