Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
But thats kind of my point. Keeping characters like Jigglypuff around just for being OG is silly given the scenario of severe roster cuts. I'm not saying Puff is an "easy" cut, Pichu and Young Link are probably the only "easy" cuts on the entire Ult roster.Thanks! ROB is a character that perplexes me a bit tbh, since I can see him both as lower priority among the 1st party unique fighters and also as mid-to-high priority, so I guess he could go either way, Ultimately I thought the characters here would be simply prioritized over him but I wouldn't be surprised if ROB ended up as a planned-but-cut character close to getting finished. Palutena though is one I kinda disagree. I understand that she's Sakurai's character basically and that she's popular but there are more popular, unique and/or iconic or bigger characters than her. I do think Sakurai will try not to cut her but in a roster where less than 50 vets return I think Sakurai would struggle a lot to justify keeping her over plenty of other characters, imo she is one of the characters most dependant on the returning roster of the next game. Jigglypuff, yeah is one of the characters that people love to see cut but at this point I'd be shocked if she ended up getting cut. Pokémon Trainer on the other hand being out-priorizied by Mewtwo is... interesting tbh. I think the former is far more unique and represents Pokémon perfectly, not to mention that in Ultimate they revamped the voice lines and added a full female counterpart, showing some actual care to the fighter. I'd bet on Pokemon Trainer over Mewtwo any time of the day personally. Konami losing their characters was moreso as I wrote above a Smash 4/Snake kind of situation where they are simply put not asked back because they can only bring so many characters back. Though I can totally see why Rayman is thought of as unlikely and he might not get in but even as someone as me who is rather harsh on the 3rd parties, I have to acknowledge that every Smash game adds at least 2-3 new 3rd party newcomers
I think that people are very biased towards certain characters and see them get cut far too easily than they actually are. And Jigglypuff is the biggest example to that. It seriously would be shocking to cut her and to assume that an OG Smash character getting cut would get no backlash is very naive. And also I have to say - it makes 0 sense to have every other Smash 64 character as untouchable and then have Jigglypuff as 'such an easy cut'. Whether people like it or not, she's much more of a lock than most other characters.
Returning Series:What characters would you love to see in Smash even if they aren’t the most logical first or next choice for their respective series? I’ve got a ton of them but here’s a few I’d be personally hyped by series that aren’t the obvious choice:
Returning Series:
Super Mario: Goomba
Legend of Zelda: Impa (HW)
Pokémon: Gengar
Fire Emblem: Tharja or Lyn
Metroid: EMMI
Xenoblade: Nia
Kid Icarus: Medusa
Sonic: Knuckles
Final Fantasy: Princess Garnet
Street Fighter: Juri, Guile, or Vega
Kingdom Hearts: Xemnas or Ansem
New Series:
Astral Chain: Jena Anderson
Chrono Trigger: Magus
Mortal Kombat: Sub-Zero
WarCraft: Illidan
Tales: Alphen/Shionne or Velvet
Disgaea: Etna
River City: Misako (RCG)
Octopath Traveller: H’aanit
Wario.Anyone who wants to cut Puff needs to think of a new character that fits in its archetype (super high aerial horizontal mobility, incredibly floaty, extremely poor ground mobility, super glass cannon)
Wario is the 14th heaviest character in Ultimate (tied with 4 other characters.)Wario.![]()
Anyone who wants to cut Puff needs to think of a new character that fits in its archetype (super high aerial horizontal mobility, incredibly floaty, extremely poor ground mobility, super glass cannon)
Buuut, he also has high air mobility, is really floaty, has stubby hitboxes, does chunky damage, and has a skillshot move that just kills you!Wario is the 14th heaviest character in Ultimate (tied with 4 other characters.)
Yeah honestly I'd wager most competitive players would rather there be 0 characters with Jigglypuff's playstyle due to its extreme focus on evasion.but let's face it most people who want Jigglypuff gone aren't wanting another mon like it in its place
Same. I’m actually trying to play through Super Metroid for the first time on the Switch Online. I rented it a couple times when I was a kid but I always got completely lost early on. I think I’ll try the Prime 1 remake after that.I hope we get a new Metroid character in Smash 6, they tend to have cool designs
Jigglypuff haters watching her get cut and replaced with a literally almost identical mon:What? Still not satisfied? Aight I gotchu:
The fact that some also value for popularity reasons (Lucario) or for gameplay reasons (Incineroar)My gripes mostly come from roster building. Turning this:
()
Into something more modest without making it just Gen 1 Pokémon and the newcomer is a huge headache, and Jigglypuff doesn't help at all.
Probably one of the best candidates for an echo fighter.Just replace Jigglypuff with Scream Tail. :V
We needed that sun!Hop off the GOAT; he threw the Actual Sun into the ocean to save his family and I will hear no disrespect.
There's no way the Atari rep is Centipede instead of Bentley Bear.A character that would be surprising and strange at the same time for Super Smash Bros. series coming as newcomer, would be the Centipede from the video game series Centipede. Of course, this is just an opinion.
I feel like Puff is in a weird camp where she sorta jumps the line when development time gets low since she's easy to make and never really changes.But thats kind of my point. Keeping characters like Jigglypuff around just for being OG is silly given the scenario of severe roster cuts. I'm not saying Puff is an "easy" cut, Pichu and Young Link are probably the only "easy" cuts on the entire Ult roster.
Also, every other 64 character has more going for them than Jigglypuff. Captain Falcon and Ness are the only other characters really worth considering cutting from the OG 12. Ness is worth keeping to represent the Mother series even if he's basically a Smash character atp. Same goes for Falcon, and if there were a character that got to stay around for just being iconic to smash everyone would agree on Falcon.
Also she has been nearly cut before, which puts her firmly in the camp of NOT being more of a lock than most other characters.
Do i hear MERCHANDISE?But I would argue Marx and Magolor are similarly popular - both have a respectable amount of merchandise,
Anyway, I actually agree withkirbstr about wanting updates to Meta Knight. I'm not sure specifically what I would suggest right now, but he's been given quite a lot more to do in the main series since Brawl and his moveset is a little barebones / sauceless right now.
That she was almost cut in Brawl holds little weight in 2025 heading into Smash 6. Ness was almost cut in Melee and you seem OK with keeping him. And besides, the point was exactly that Jigglypuff is as much of a Smash character as Fox, Ness and Captain Falcon and they also are part of the OG 12 so there is definitely some double standard you raise in the OG 12 argument not applying specifically to Jigglypuff and yet not to any other Smash 64 character that is known almost exclusively from Smash. Like if there are severe cuts and the 'OG 12' argument is not strong enough to keep someone, it's not just Jigglypuff who will get cut and someone like Captain Falcon and Ness is getting the boot along with her. That's the whole point I'm trying to makeBut thats kind of my point. Keeping characters like Jigglypuff around just for being OG is silly given the scenario of severe roster cuts. I'm not saying Puff is an "easy" cut, Pichu and Young Link are probably the only "easy" cuts on the entire Ult roster.
Also, every other 64 character has more going for them than Jigglypuff. Captain Falcon and Ness are the only other characters really worth considering cutting from the OG 12. Ness is worth keeping to represent the Mother series even if he's basically a Smash character atp. Same goes for Falcon, and if there were a character that got to stay around for just being iconic to smash everyone would agree on Falcon.
Also she has been nearly cut before, which puts her firmly in the camp of NOT being more of a lock than most other characters.
And you'd be wrong because Ness and Captain Falcon carry whole franchises with them and Jigglypuff is just one of many Pokémon that could be purged on a moments notice.Like if there are severe cuts and the 'OG 12' argument is not strong enough to keep someone, it's not just Jigglypuff who will get cut and someone like Captain Falcon and Ness is getting the boot along with her. That's the whole point I'm trying to make
Yeah like, I don't think Puff is getting cut, but Ness and Falcon carry a lot more with them than Puff does, especially since I feel like Lucas getting cut (again, I guess I should add) is extremely likely since he's the only character on the roster now that's still Japan-exclusive I'm pretty sure lolAnd you'd be wrong because Ness and Captain Falcon carry whole franchises with them and Jigglypuff is just one of many Pokémon that could be purged on a moments notice.
And you'd be wrong because Ness and Captain Falcon carry whole franchises with them and Jigglypuff is just one of many Pokémon that could be purged on a moments notice.
Temporarily unblocking to say that if we're at a point we're talking about cutting Ness, Lucas is already gone and out of the equation.
Well everybody that gets added to Smash picks up some degree of popularity. Even if they weren't popular before, they'll pick up fans by getting played.The issue with speculating roster cuts is that whoever gets cut needs to be less popular than everyone you add as newcomers.
As such, it's easy to speculate cuts to 3rd party characters because "muh licensing", when that has yet to ever be an issue for the Smash team or Nintendo.
If the next smash game does make big cuts, I'd hope they stop prioritizing "series vets" that are only really relevant to Smash and nobody is banging the table to keep.
Like, it's time for Jigglypuff to go. I'd rather keep every pokemon on the roster over it. Same with ZSS and Sheik. Cool concepts for what they were originally designed for, but would people really miss them? Falco too. I think before Ultimate cutting Falco would sound like blasphemy, but nowadays he's more known for being an obnoxious cutscene combo character than anything.
Roy is the only other character whose game is Japanese exclusive if Melee doesn’t count but has appeared in Fire Emblem games released in the west such as Blazing Blade’s epilogue (supposedly not in Europe), Heroes and Engage.especially since I feel like Lucas getting cut (again, I guess I should add) is extremely likely since he's the only character on the roster now that's still Japan-exclusive I'm pretty sure lol
I didn’t know you had me blockedTemporarily unblocking to say that if we're at a point we're talking about cutting Ness, Lucas is already gone and out of the equation.
Never said that wasn't the case but even so, we are talking about situations where the cuts are harsh. And in harsh conditions, it's absolutely not out of the realm of possibility for whole franchises that are not exactly top priority to get axed (in fact it's rather possible). But in case the cuts aren't as dire of course they're not going to go but neither is Jigglypuff. As mentioned before ease of development is on her side and if being a Smash staple would help the likes of Ness and Captain Falcon, I don't see why it wouldn't help her either (again, we are talking about harsh cuts vs non-harsh cuts).And you'd be wrong because Ness and Captain Falcon carry whole franchises with them and Jigglypuff is just one of many Pokémon that could be purged on a moments notice.
The mural on Nintendo Museum let you know which franchises will be represented with fighters, just see the 3x3 squares. (Maybe Samus or DK [interchangeable] can have the 8th slot in this "the New 8" scenario, while one of the two, Fox, Alear and Noah will be the four unlockables)The solution is to disregard the entire series history and decide the roster based on sales.
Cut all the retro characters, surprise characters, secondary characters and any characters/franchise that hasn't been featured in/gotten a new game within the past 2-3 years. All newcomers must come from an upcoming release that's expected to sell well, so no new franchises. Any franchise below 50mil units sold does not qualify.
The result? The perfect investor roster.
The fans will love it. Trust me
![]()
Also there's more Pokemon present that weren't around in Brawl who she could feasibly be higher priority than, so by default she probably wouldn't have to wait as long to get developed (though I still expect her to be low priority); I could see her surviving simply from thatSo like yes she's low priority and yes there's always that chance, but if she's getting put in half the games before an iconic super popular Pokemon like Mewtwo is, clearly there's something at least Sakurai sees worth in in some regard.
I guess it'd come down to how you define "harsh cuts"; I think there would have to be less than 30 first party veterans for Ness, Falcon, and other similar characters to be in danger, and for Ms. Pufferton, it's more like... under 50-55, as someone likely in the middle at best for Pokemon since I can't bias my way into putting her above Pikachu, Charizard, Lucario or Greninja. And I feel 50-55 first party vets is much more plausible than under 30.Never said that wasn't the case but even so, we are talking about situations where the cuts are harsh. And in harsh conditions, it's absolutely not out of the realm of possibility for whole franchises that are not exactly top priority to get axed (in fact it's rather possible). But in case the cuts aren't as dire of course they're not going to go but neither is Jigglypuff. As mentioned before ease of development is on her side and if being a Smash staple would help the likes of Ness and Captain Falcon, I don't see why it wouldn't help her either (again, we are talking about harsh cuts vs non-harsh cuts).
Above all else, I do these are Pokemons most essential four. Things would have to be really egregious for any of them to be cut.Pikachu, Charizard, Lucario or Greninja
Maybe you can't, but I definitely can.since I can't bias my way into putting her above Pikachu, Charizard, Lucario or Greninja.
This is kind of a weird argument chain because it wasn't initially talking about Ness or Captain Falcon. I brought them up as legacy picks in a more general conversation about them. Then it kinda devolved into weather or not Ness and Captain Falcon should be cut based on what inclusion criteria we're supposed to be using...I dunno.The Ness disrespect frustrates me. The Mother series is well cemented into Smash's identity and unlikely to be carved out entirely unless we see a massive series overhaul. Ness is one of the more foundational zoner / mage archetypes in the game as well as consistently one of the most popular characters to play across both casual and competitive bases. Removing him would be egregious for all of these reasons. Whereas keeping or removing Jigglypuff probably comes down to late development as usual. I think she probably sticks around but it will likely always come down to that.
Also, cutting Captain Falcon is a ridiculous conversation that deserves no real credibility. Even if he wasn't one of the most iconic and popular characters in the series, F-Zero 99 just came out two years ago. GX being one of the starter NSO titles is significant too. F-Zero arguably has more going on right now than even Star Fox does. And that's not an invitation to start contemplating Fox's removal either.