Not self-sabotage in that if they don't do it the Switch 2 will falter, just that it's standard practice even in less important years, so why would you not advertise the games like you usually do in such a critical time in the system's lifespan, its first holiday on the market? You're forgoing useful marketing.
Nintendo's standard practice for release and announcement has been ever changing since the Wii U. I honestly don't think there's solid enough precedence in modern times to call for both a summer and fall direct in specifically the first year of a consoles life. Nintendo could just as easily decide to hold off on some of their back catalogue to survey tariffs or smt as much as they could decide to break the two directs back half year 1 rule.
It doesn't really matter if they don't have that many new reveals, the point is they'd show the stuff that holiday again, show more of it, and help build hype for it. Meanwhile you throw in some stuff coming in 2026 to further incentivize people get the system, and to actually have some new reveals.
I mean, makes sense, but I still definitely could see them bouncing a fall direct in favor of a late summer showcase that they'd follow up with a January Direct. Since Mario Kart will have already launched and Prime 4 will be looking at its fourth gameplay trailer, that kinda just leaves Kirby and DK to really dive deep into. I feel like keeping up a showcase every few months might be hype but will lead to them showing their hand too early.
I want to make it clear I don't think this is at all a crazy prediction for two directs or anything, I just see it as an option on the table rather than definitively what's probably going to happen. Nintendo could choose a lot of opportune times to announce or show something off, and they pretty often leave us scratching our heads wondering as to why they didn't do something.
Also Sakurai is not going to call it a small project, is he? They want to actually sell this game, that makes it sound kinda anemic.
Sakurai noted it as big because of the hands he needed on deck to make it. Of course he wouldn't have described the game as small if it was actually a smaller title, but if we're rolling with that logic he presumably would have gone down a different route in describing the game in the first place. If you want something a bit more concrete, I guess the best I've got is that Bamco's studio hirings and structure don't seem to imply Air Riders is a B team game. By all accounts aside from maybe timing, this does seem to be a big title since its got seemingly the same amount of support Smash itself has (if you buy that 2D action title is Smash, that is).
...it didn't close out the show, DK did. I mean Nintendo revealed all of... like... two new first-party games that aren't casual stuff they wouldn't end the show with, Kirby and DK.
My bad, I did originally have a line mentioning that in my comment, but I think I accidentally deleted it in formatting.
Agreed it has more than them. Though I'm not sure that's a super high bar.
That's why I brought them up. 'Kirby Spinoff' is apt but doesn't quite convey the scope of Air Riders when the same label often applies to titles like Super Kirby Clash, y'know?
Nothing against Air Riders, it's just... Kirby is no Mario, Pokemon, Zelda, Splatoon, AC, Smash, even DK. Things like it, FE, Metroid, Xenoblade, Yoshi, Pikmin, etc. would be the game that complements the "main" holiday game, catering its release around the bigger title, rather than vice versa.
This statement kinda confuses me tbh. Kirby Forgotten Land sold double what Metroid Dread did and that was a holiday title. Looking at series like FE, Yoshi, Pikmin, etc. Kirby still outpaces them. Even comparing a heavy hitter like DK to Kirby, Star Allies ended up matching about the same sales as the Tropical Freeze rerelease did. If anything, that would place them both at the same level, no?
I mean, to put my point in perspective, Xenoblade as a franchise is listed by Google as having sold around 9 million copies by the end of 2023, and Forgotten Land as a game is currently sitting at 7.5 million sales. This is definitely just semantics at this point, and that isn't a knock against Xenoblade just cause it hasn't sold enough, but I really don't see Kirby as one of Nintendo's minor Ips, nor as an odd series to take the Holiday Title mantle, moreso it just looks like that because of how many titles the series tends to put out on the smaller scale. In that sense, I would say its best comparison might actually be Pokemon.
I think this is just a case of agree to disagree at the end of the day, no? Kirby Air Riders isn't gonna end up being the Holiday game anyhow given how early into the year it was revealed. That sorta title is definitely being saved for now.