Bandana Waddle Dee could probably work if you had him switch between a Spear and a Parasol for his moveset (here's my take on this concept).
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I disagree. That would mean no Bowser, no Peach, no Zelda, no Diddy Kong... Street Fighter can do that kind of stuff because it's not a cross-over, but Smash Bros. is.Next Smash game should do what Street Fighter 3 did: only the original 8 return, and everybody else is brand new to the series.
Next Smash game should do what Street Fighter 3 did: only the original 8 return, and everybody else is brand new to the series.
Not to mention representation for SEVERAL first-party IPs, including some that are still very much relevant today (Wario, Animal Crossing, Splatoon, Pikmin, Xenoblade...... and yes, even Fire Emblem, which couldn't NOT have Marth).I disagree. That would mean no Bowser, no Peach, no Zelda, no Diddy Kong... Street Fighter can do that kind of stuff because it's not a cross-over, but Smash Bros. is.
Again, not every point of view is created equal, and if people have a problem with Daisy's "illusion" being broken, then defending the idea of her being a costume goes against this reasoning. This is the main point I'm trying to get across: "Daisy's current moveset doesn't fit her character, but it would be OK for her to have the exact same taunts and victory animations as Peach" is inherently contradictory, no matter how you slice it."I can't understand a point of view or I disagree with it, so I have to act like the people defending it are utterly stupid" is what I consider a rude behavior, but it seems that we'll never agree on that.
But that's the thing, what would you actually achieve with such a miniscule amount of saved dev time? Coding the AI for an AT isn't exactly a trivial task, if Dark Samus reverted to being an AT she'd be more likely to be cut from playable status outright, rather than pulling double duty as both a costume and an AT. If people instead advocated for the characters to be cut outright, I would still kick up a fuss, but at least they would actually be making more of an attempt to commit to the "free up dev time for other things" angle. In addition, they wouldn't be outright contradicting the "Daisy being a clone breaks the illusion of the character" argument.Granted, that's not much.
Even if you were right about this alleged nonsense, that's not how politeness works. You're not supposed to be polite only with people whose opinion you agree with... But clearly, you're not even trying to understand.Again, not every point of view is created equal, and if people have a problem with Daisy's "illusion" being broken, then defending the idea of her being a costume goes against this reasoning. This is the main point I'm trying to get across: "Daisy's current moveset doesn't fit her character, but it would be OK for her to have the exact same taunts and victory animations as Peach" is inherently contradictory, no matter how you slice it.
Yeah, because those damned "people" just want the roster to be downsized for no reason at all... Also, I don't see why a Dark Samus AT would mean no Dark Samus alt: it's just a skin, they're quickly done.But that's the thing, what would you actually achieve with such a miniscule amount of saved dev time? Coding the AI for an AT isn't exactly a trivial task, if Dark Samus reverted to being an AT she'd be more likely to be cut from playable status outright, rather than pulling double duty as both a costume and an AT. If people instead advocated for the characters to be cut outright, I would still kick up a fuss, but at least they would actually be making more of an attempt to commit to the "free up dev time for other things" angle. In addition, they wouldn't be outright contradicting the "Daisy being a clone breaks the illusion of the character" argument.
Another point: if people simply believe that the dev time that went to characters like Daisy should have gone elsewhere in the first place, then it wasn't really about "clones bad" in the first place, yet I still run into people with a blanket "clones bad" mentality, which fails to take into account factors such as how not every clone is inherently "disrespectful" like Daisy or Dark Samus (or Ganondorf) are.
Do you hate Daisy so much?why dont we just erase daisy from existence?
YesOh, by the way.Do you hate Daisy so much?
May I ask why?
not really sure. she just irritates meMay I ask why?
Fair enough. That happens.not really sure. she just irritates me
it certainly doesFair enough. That happens.
Something I forgot to ask you: if you would actually welcome more Echoes, why did you say before that "there really was little if any reason not to just make them an alternate costume?"I may not see clones as too big of a deal now (and in fact, I actually welcome more Echoes)
It's not about disagreement, it's about outright double standards. Are you telling me that you're perfectly willing to be polite with outright hypocrites?You're not supposed to be polite only with people whose opinion you agree with...
Considering the justifications that they use, why should I believe otherwise?Yeah, because those damned "people" just want the roster to be downsized for no reason at all...
Do you believe that assist trophies deconfirm? If so, then it's the same reason as that. If not, then at least you're consistent on that frontAlso, I don't see why a Dark Samus AT would mean no Dark Samus alt:
It says "Be civil" right there in the topic title.It's not about disagreement, it's about outright double standards. Are you telling me that you're perfectly willing to be polite with outright hypocrites?
I was talking about the Smash4 clones, and as I already stated, bloat WAS an issue in Smash4 so far as I'm concerned.Something I forgot to ask you: if you would actually welcome more Echoes, why did you say before that "there really was little if any reason not to just make them an alternate costume?"
Again, there's a difference between merely disagreeing and being a hypocrite about it. I call out these double standards because these kinds of misconceptions have a tendency to get out of control. And going back to a previous point that I made: the reason I made my "there's no excuse to complain about bloat" argument that people considered to be uncivil in the first place is because that entire argument hinged on an aspect that no longer exists in Ultimate. Do you have any suggestions as to a better way that I could have communicated that point, and is there a way for me to call out these aforementioned double standards while being less forceful about it?It says "Be civil" right there in the topic title.
And there are a LOT of people in this world you're going to disagree with. There's no reason to go around starting trouble when you don't have to.
You weren't exactly clear about that before, your wording of "The thing that people dislike about clones" implied that it's the reason why people complain about clones in the present day, and as I mentioned before Ultimate has already removed that excuse.I was talking about the Smash4 clones
You. I like you. Keep talking.While I'm happy with the roster as is, Euden from Dragalia Lost would've been cool in Smash (be as it a Spirit or a fighter)
i would have thought that would be a popular oneI think Ultiumate should've gotten a few more modes throughout its life cycle.
what do you mean by that?non-bri'ish Zelda.
BOTW Zeldawhat do you mean by that?
was she meant to have a British accent?BOTW Zelda
sounds like one to me, or something very poshwas she meant to have a British accent?
fair enoughsounds like one to me, or something very posh
I mean, I wouldn't mind something like Subspace but with few if any cutscenes (or only real-time cutscenes like in Melee). My main beef with Melee's Adventure is that it's too short, whereas Subspace gave you a large amount of stages, sprawled out across a map that isn't intended to be cleared in a single sitting (in fact, it's pretty comparable to the full-length platformer titles from the SNES era onward). And sure, at the time, I thought Melee's Adventure was amazing, but going back to anything like it (or Smash Run) after Brawl just feels like a step backwards. Still, after Smash WiiU and Ultimate, Melee Adventure (or Smash Run) is at least preferable to having no platforming mode at all.I would rather have a new Adventure mode similar to Melee's over another Story mode with fancy cutscenes or the chance to hear non-bri'ish Zelda.
Nah man, I think Shadow (or Isaac) got it the worst considering he was deconfirmed, IIRC, in the last Direct. People were hyping them up the entire speculation season because they weren't even revealed up until that point. And everyone banked on a Shadow echo.Speaking as someone who doesn't care for Geno that much, his disconfirmation was far and away the most brutal of any requested character.
The three of them were in a fake leak which didn't become real cause Smash fans believe in fake rumours.Nah man, I think Shadow (or Isaac) got it the worst considering he was deconfirmed, IIRC, in the last Direct. People were hyping them up the entire speculation season because they weren't even revealed up until that point. And everyone banked on a Shadow echo.
What about Skull Kid? After showing the new Moon assist and keeping Young Link's final smash secret all along, he was deconfirmed... on the website, after the last Direct.Nah man, I think Shadow (or Isaac) got it the worst considering he was deconfirmed, IIRC, in the last Direct. People were hyping them up the entire speculation season because they weren't even revealed up until that point. And everyone banked on a Shadow echo.
Sorta agree with both of these. While I don't like Buzzwole or Pheromosa very much and would rather have Decidueye over either of them, I think Incineroar was the better choice over Decidueye. For one, Decidueye got into Pokken, so it's cool that another Pokemon from gen 7 got the nod for Smash. For another, Decidueye would have been an archer who can fly... that's basically Pit, though could have some overlap with the other archers (the Links and to a lesser extent, Byleth) as well. I'm sure they could have done plenty to differentiate Decidueye, mind you, but when I think about that in comparison to a grappling wrestler, I can't help but feel that Incineroar is more unique by a pretty wide margin. And might be worth mentioning here: I like Decidueye a lot, so I'm not coming from a place of any dislike towards it.I'd prefer Paula as a Ness echo rather than Ninten.
Incineroar was not the ideal choice for a Gen VII Pokemon (that honor goes to Buzzwole or Pheromosa), but it was a much better choice than Decidueye could've ever been. I'd rather keep it around than Greninja.
Speaking as someone who doesn't care for Geno that much, his disconfirmation was far and away the most brutal of any requested character.