Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
classic link tends to refer to the original oneYeah, I know I've said all of these before, but hey.
- "Classic" Link (i.e. TP and/or OoT Link) should have been an echo for the current Link in Ultimate.
- Ganondorf's sword smashes ruined his moveset design.
- Bowser's Melee/Brawl animations were more fun to watch than his Smash 4-on animations.
Nintendo has never referred to the original design as "Classic Link", and still, they would need to call TP/OoT Link something.classic link tends to refer to the original one
I always liked the idea of including Hero's Shade from TP, and giving him OoT Link's moveset (then he would work as a rep for both games)Nintendo has never referred to the original design as "Classic Link", and still, they would need to call TP/OoT Link something.
He would be a great alt for TP/OoT Link ngl.I always liked the idea of including Hero's Shade from TP, and giving him OoT Link's moveset (then he would work as a rep for both games)
yes they did, hyrule warriors.Nintendo has never referred to the original design as "Classic Link", and still, they would need to call TP/OoT Link something.
Hyrule Warriors called that outfit the Classic Tunic. Close, but not quite.yes they did, hyrule warriors.
theyd called the hero of time and twilight link respectively
and outfit designed to look like the original. youre just splitting hairsHyrule Warriors called that outfit the Classic Tunic. Close, but not quite.
Even then, that's just Hyrule Warriors. Smash can call the combination of OoT and TP Link whatever they want, "classic" or not.and outfit designed to look like the original. youre just splitting hairs
and perhaps more to the point it wasnt the oufits based on Oot and TP that were called classic
you mean a fully licensed Nintendo game with their stamp of approval that’s pretty much the same situation as smash? You’re right they could call them whatever they want but they won’t be calling him classicEven then, that's just Hyrule Warriors. Smash can call the combination of OoT and TP Link whatever they want, "classic" or not.
What would you call the combination of OoT and TP Link?you mean a fully licensed Nintendo game with their stamp of approval that’s pretty much the same situation as smash? You’re right they could call them whatever they want but they won’t be calling him classic
i told you, hero of time and twilight linkWhat would you call the combination of OoT and TP Link?
Eh, I guess an Olimar and Alph naming situation could work too.i told you, hero of time and twilight link
I would, I'd cut Sheik and Young Link at the very least. And add Impa and Ganon.i wouldnt cut any zelda character
yeah I saw you say that which gave me the ideaI would, I'd cut Sheik and Young Link at the very least. And add Impa and Ganon.
I support all 4On a similar note to Gardevoir, I don't get why people want ninja Impa or Skull Kid over elderly Impa or Majora's Mask alone - might just be that I look to body shape in a fighter above canon powers, but an old mage and shapeshifting mess of abstract limbs strikes me as much more appealing than another ninja or another magic child.
I'm also intrigued by Old Impa and by far prefer an elderly newcomer by this point. Old Impa just seem more promising. Majora, 2nd incarnation would be so fun and unique. I could imagine it having its moon walk as a taunt.On a similar note to Gardevoir, I don't get why people want ninja Impa or Skull Kid over elderly Impa or Majora's Mask alone - might just be that I look to body shape in a fighter above canon powers, but an old mage and shapeshifting mess of abstract limbs strikes me as much more appealing than another ninja or another magic child.
or a dash attackI could imagine it having its moon walk as a taunt.
There's nothing that an old version of Impa ever did... I guess they could use BotW Impa, and give her the moveset of her younger self in Age of Calamity, with as drawback being much much slower and weaker, but would you want that ?On a similar note to Gardevoir, I don't get why people want ninja Impa or Skull Kid over elderly Impa or Majora's Mask alone - might just be that I look to body shape in a fighter above canon powers, but an old mage and shapeshifting mess of abstract limbs strikes me as much more appealing than another ninja or another magic child.
As I said, canon powers don't matter to me as much as body shape.There's nothing that an old version of Impa ever did... I guess they could use BotW Impa, and give her the moveset of her younger self in Age of Calamity, with as drawback being much much slower and weaker, but would you want that ?
considering the amount of made up moves we got im not sure it matters. although if they give old impa the giant sword and nigata i may never stop laughingThere's nothing that an old version of Impa ever did... I guess they could use BotW Impa, and give her the moveset of her younger self in Age of Calamity, with as drawback being much much slower and weaker, but would you want that ?
how do you know players of style savvy dont play smash?The Style Savy Character i forgot her exact name! Shouldnt be playable in smash for a long time! Making a Character playable that is pretty heavily targeted towards an audience that doesnt play Smash is a dumb idea! Especially when there are still so many other "casual Game" Characters that tbf are third party but i think i make an exception in this case!
Im sure most would prefer the story Of seasons Farmer (Both genders) over the style savy Artist!
Pls dont kill me!
Im mostly guessing because of the diffrent target audiences!how do you know players of style savvy dont play smash?
well it’s very presumptuous to think that a casual game is only played by casual gamersIm mostly guessing because of the diffrent target audiences!
Also im not saying no one is or even not many just not most of them!
I could be wrong tho im not sure!
Lana hardly counts as an actual Zelda character though.There should be other LoZ fighters than just Triforce Wielders
Like for example, Lana from Hyrule Warriors
i know some would say it doesI hope Sakurai continues the trend of returnee stages, I believe Smash should thrive off of nostalgia.
That's not an unpopular opinion, and I don't even agree with it.There should be other LoZ fighters than just Triforce Wielders
Like for example, Lana from Hyrule Warriors
Do you mean focusing on recent characters? Would you rather that Smash focus on old obscure characters instead?Modern advancement is making Smash tacky. A modern focus is the worst thing that could happen to Smash from a sheer charm perspective. I feel like Smash started with a strong retro emphasis, that is better preserved, but hasn't really been strong since Brawl. I hope Sakurai continues the trend of returnee stages, I believe Smash should thrive off of nostalgia.
lol That's not possible. Its nearly impossible to keep the characters nostalgic when their the game's core advancement. My argument is more regarding Smash's aesthetic and stages. If a new Smash is on the horizon, Sakurai needs to follow the trend of retro appeal. SMB3 is ironically without its very own stage, which is rightfully deserving. The representation of SMB3 thru Super Mario Maker is a terrible concept. Earthbound, OoT and DK Country has all gotten multiple stages. This is the trend Sakurai should follow. Super Mario Sunshine, Majora's Mask, Super Mario Bros. 2 USA all should have multiple stages.Do you mean focusing on recent characters? Would you rather that Smash focus on old obscure characters instead?
I'd like that too, but as a balance between old obscure guys and fresh new flavor-of-the-month faces.
hmm how about pinata village, stone tower temple and the place you fight wart?Earthbound, OoT and DK Country has all gotten multiple stages. This is the trend Sakurai should follow. Super Mario Sunshine, Majora's Mask, Super Mario Bros. 2 USA all should have multiple stages.
Several stages per game? How many stages would that make in total?lol That's not possible. Its nearly impossible to keep the characters nostalgic when their the game's core advancement. My argument is more regarding Smash's aesthetic and stages. If a new Smash is on the horizon, Sakurai needs to follow the trend of retro appeal. SMB3 is ironically without its very own stage, which is rightfully deserving. The representation of SMB3 thru Super Mario Maker is a terrible concept. Earthbound, OoT and DK Country has all gotten multiple stages. This is the trend Sakurai should follow. Super Mario Sunshine, Majora's Mask, Super Mario Bros. 2 USA all should have multiple stages.
Smash's new menu should use the inspiration from the Nintendo logo style like:
View attachment 354451
Now imagine it with a white background. And (logo-ing) Smash Modes? See how interesting and good ol' it'd make Smash's overall appeal? This is what Smash needs again.
Earthbound has now gotten Onett, Fourside and Magicant, 3 in total to get an idea, but Melee's idea was balanced enough, two per game works. That's not to say said game shouldn't eventually get 3 like Earthbound, especially if its critically acclaimed. And has vast stage potential.Several stages per game? How many stages would that make in total?