Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Or the bonus features that come with the particular version. For example, some (ie, few)multi-platform games on the GC had bonus content when linking up the GBA. For example, there was a few extra weapons in a splinter cell game that were controlled with the GBA.blaksheap82 said:But if people have two systems, either a PS3 or a X360 and a Rev, when they buy a multi-platform game, won't they probably just buy it for whichever system has better graphics?
Three words:blaksheap82 said:But if people have two systems, either a PS3 or a X360 and a Rev, when they buy a multi-platform game, won't they probably just buy it for whichever system has better graphics?
Online play?blaksheap82 said:and we all know what Microsoft's focus is (and will always be).
Despite the fact that Nintendo announced at E3 they are doing online games? Despite the fact that the DS is online? Despite the fact that even if that percentage is true (which I doubt), that's still a few hundred thousands (if not in the millions) people who play XBox live?evilstrawberry99 said:As much as I hate to say it, i dont think there will be online play(according to IGN). I guess Iwata said "nobody wants to go online" and backed it up by showing that only 20% of xbox owners play on xbox live.
EDIT: ok iwata never said that xbox thing but its true.
they work on my home computer, but not at my school.Mic_128 said:Wow. Those red x's look so cool.
Uh, no. How is having good graphics cheap? Out of the Xbox games I own, I bought them for the fun factor, not for the graphics. I didn't buy Halo 2 to run around and be like "omg teh grafix!" but yeah, I could do that if I wanted, the game has great graphics. And why wouldn't have Halo 2 been a success without Live? It's a lot of fun, just like the original Halo (which also sold a ton). Online just made the game even better, being able to jump into a game with up to 15 other people whenever you wanted. I'd disagree with your Smash Bros' online play statement because of that, online replay value does nothing but add replay value and fun to the game and games without it now a days are very lacking.blaksheap82 said:And Cashed, I meant graphics when I mentioned Microsoft's focus, but online play is in there too. It still shows how cheap Microsoft is with their products, the fact that their games can't stand on their own without stuff like that. I doubt Halo 2 would have been as huge a success without Xbox Live, whereas Smash has just as much replay factor without online play.
This arguement always pissed me off. Sony and Nintendo ONLY care about money. They don't care if you enjoy the game as long as you buy more of their stuff. They are businesses. Any other methods will never work. Plus, if Nintendo didn't care about money their games would be free.tell me, Cashed, does the phrase "multi-billion dollar corporation" mean anything to you?
here i'll give you a simple equation.
Microsoft+goal=$$$$$$$$$$$
(yeah i know that was sarcasm. i think. w/e)
If they're as bad as the "joke" about Microsoft oinly wantng your money, then yes, no more jokes. went and looked at the pics in the link, and I just thought, meh. I couldn't be bothered posting just to say "meh", so here you go.ChRed2AKrisp said:should i just forget about trying to contibute and adding thoughtful insights or making jokes?
You mean a rumble pack?kaid said:I liket the suggestion (hidden in the "comments" section) that the controller might use gyro-force-feedback.