It's weird how obsessed anti-AI-bros are with the definition of "art". There are tons of valid arguments against AI use, including recreationally, but everyone just focuses on weird non-relevant etymology-based petty insults that vaguely tie in to the abstract idea of the human condition, aimed at... basically nobody. Like, you should be critcising the lack of attribution these tools give and their marketing as anything other than a party trick, or the big Hollywood studios and clickbait farms actually trying to replace people, not the terminology of all things, or - as I've made fun of anti-AI-bros for aiming at a lot - kids who want to make SpongeBob say **** words. There are situations where terminology is important, like class and race, but this isn't really one of them, "art" to many just means "still image", and I'm pretty sure that's the notion the term AI art is meant to evoke, not that someone using it is a sophisticated and serious artiste, just as smashing paint at a wall can be art in a literal sense, even if maybe not figurative.