Oasis_S
Smash Legend
No reason to believe it would be. Sakurai's not an enigma.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Zamus being included for whatever reason is not mutually exclusive to Ridley being "too big".Even if the most popular choice was Metroid by 2005, Zamus still got over Metroid as a playable character. Which means we have to try to guess by Sakurai's standards. To him, size can be an issue.
Pretty much what happened to all of the Brawl threads of characters that didn't make it. The only ones that survived after Brawl were for the ones that got in.So what like happens to this thread and like the 75+ or so pages it will have uptill E3 if Ridley along the lines is confirmed not in.
Do all these threads get locked and closed down? All the char thread that didnt make it?
Sakurai is not hard to understand?@Bowserlick: I don't actually. WHAT I MEAN IS THOUGH, Sakurai has given us plenty to go off of, he's not that hard to understand. There are some things you can say definitely will or will not happen.
You are the joke.Sakurai is not hard to understand?
Hes worse than women..
Ow i see ok iyt coolYou are the joke.
This subforum won't be closed until after the game's release, if things work like Brawl did. Character threads aren't closed even if they're confirmed to not be playable. I believe newcomers don't get official threads/subforums until the game's release as well.
The point is that Sakurai has control of which characters get in. You argued that Ridley was not the most popular character to get in at 2005. Fine, but neither was Zamus and she got in. Sakurai doesn't always go by polls. He has reasons for selecting characters or not selecting characters. And Ridley's size compared to Samus's size might have been an issue.Zamus being included for whatever reason is not mutually exclusive to Ridley being "too big".
Bear in mind that the only playable characters in the series at the time were Power Suit Samus (with all its varieties) and just recently Zero Suit Samus, something completely different from the norm. Zamus being another female character (despite being the same character) made Sakurai happy to include her.
They didn't skip over Ganondorf (who's a more prominent and popular villain than Ridley) in Melee to give him their best efforts in the next game. And it's totally ruined who would have been an extremely popular SSB character if done right but is now almost a joke character.Size? I'm more inclined to think that, if Ridley was purposefully skipped over for Brawl, it was due to him requiring "the best efforts" of the developers to put him in. And, you know, with 60% of development time allegedly being allotted toward the SSE, that might not have been in the cards. The team very well could have thought two boss appearances and the playability of literally every other popular character would be enough to placate fans until...two months from now at E3.
Must not have communicated my message clearly enough amid all the snark...the "best efforts" quote is from Sakurai's Nintendo Power interview, and is an indicator that Ridley would be a fairly labor-intensive character to design. Ganondorf, on the other hand, would have been skipped over if he hadn't shared Captain Falcon's body type, which made him an easy last-minute addition. Too bad the desire to satisfy the fans of a terrible moveset is preventing Sakurai from potentially luring new fans to an even better redesigned one.They didn't skip over Ganondorf (who's a more prominent and popular villain than Ridley) in Melee to give him their best efforts in the next game. And it's totally ruined who would have been an extremely popular SSB character if done right but is now almost a joke character.
You really do not listen, do you?The point is that Sakurai has control of which characters get in. You argued that Ridley was not the most popular character to get in at 2005. Fine, but neither was Zamus and she got in. Sakurai doesn't always go by polls. He has reasons for selecting characters or not selecting characters. And Ridley's size compared to Samus's size might have been an issue.
And the hunters could have been decided to be playable characters at that time.
Ah gotcha and couldn't agree more about G'dorf.Must not have communicated my message clearly enough amid all the snark...the "best efforts" quote is from Sakurai's Nintendo Power interview, and is an indicator that Ridley would be a fairly labor-intensive character to design. Ganondorf, on the other hand, would have been skipped over if he hadn't shared Captain Falcon's body type, which made him an easy last-minute addition. Too bad the desire to satisfy the fans of a terrible moveset is preventing Sakurai from potentially luring new fans to an even better redesigned one.
Metroid Hunters was released in 2006. The characters probably existed before the roster finalization process. Sakurai could have included a Hunter just as he included Roy before his game. I do listen, I just use logic.You really do not listen, do you?
The only playable characters at the time where Samus and Zamus. The Hunters did not exist when Sakurai was deciding characters; they would debut the following year. And no, he couldn't have just "decided to add one later", as I'm willing to bet you're going to argue. The reason for the finalization process was to avoid adding characters to the roster later in production, as that causes issues. Sonic is a prime example of that; he was added to the roster so late that Brawl's release had to be delayed to accommodate him and his series.
The only other route he could have gone if Ridley was "too big" was Dark Samus, as Prime 2 came out months before the finalization. This obviously didn't happen.
You are also under the pretense that Sakurai deliberately chose not to include Ridley because he's "too big" (which is a bull**** argument in itself; it didn't stop Bowser nor did it stop the microscopic Olimar). I'm arguing for the fact that Sakurai wouldn't have had reason at all to even consider Ridley at that point in time because for all he knew, Ridley was just a generic fire breathing dragon no one cared about. And since (again, for all he knew) no one really cared about a specific Metroid character enough to begin with, Sakurai instead looked to a new "gimmick" for the existing one, by giving the character another form to play as from a recent game.
While it's true that not every character Sakurai includes has popularity to influence them, there Is only a minority that don't.
Thing is, Sakurai knew that Roy would catch on, in both Melee and his own series.Metroid Hunters was released in 2006. The characters probably existed before the roster finalization process. Sakurai could have included a Hunter just as he included Roy before his game. I do listen, I just use logic..
No, Sakurai didn't know Roy would catch on. You are wrong. He could have thought Roy would catch on based on FE sales, experience, luck or anything else but he didn't know.Thing is, Sakurai knew that Roy would catch on, in both Melee and his own series.
None of the Hunters ever caught on. Even in their own series. Another problem with the hunter logic is... who would he pick?
None of the hunters are more important than each other and none of them are portrayed as more important. People only go for Sylux because they think that his ship follows Samus in the end of Metroid Prime 3 (when there is no proof whatsoever), not because he's popular or more important than the others.
Alright, I guess he didn't KNOW but he made a correct prediction. My logic still stands.No, Sakurai didn't know Roy would catch on. You are wrong. He could have thought Roy would catch on based on FE sales, experience, luck or anything else but he didn't know.
No, but it was specifically with characters just at the end when they were running out of time.I wouldn't really call Brawl a rush job...?
Never use Roy as a an excuse. Roy was not initially planned for Melee's roster, and only came to be because Sakurai wanted to boost the roster later in production with easy to add clones (or "model swaps" as he called them). When in the process of finding working clones, he was given a sneak peek into Roy, and that's who he decided on as a clone for Marth because he had a gut feeling that people would like him and to advertise the upcoming game (and the series as a whole).Metroid Hunters was released in 2006. The characters probably existed before the roster finalization process. Sakurai could have included a Hunter just as he included Roy before his game. I do listen, I just use logic.
Alright, I will say that it literally "could" have been that way, but it is very unlikely to have happened because it's absolutely ridiculous and filled with glaring holes in logic.I am saying that Sakurai could have not included Ridley because he thought he was too big ( in relation to Samus). Who would have guessed Doctor Mario for Melee? I am just saying that people screaming about the "too big" argument not existing in the mind of Sakurai is crazy. It could have been so.
First you accuse me of being "emo", now you accuse me of "screaming" when I have given full analysis of logic based on events that actually happened and factual information rather than "what ifs" and excuses like you have done nothing but.Your screaming is not akin to logic. If it is, your roster prediction better be spot on. Because somehow you know how Sakurai thinks.
Alright, I will say that it literally "could" have been that way, but it is very unlikely to have happened because it's absolutely ridiculous and filled with glaring holes in logic.
YOU SEE, that's a good example of why it's a waste of time to consider all possibilities. When all signs point to one thing, you may as well just say it's going to happen. Like when people give some (arbitrary) percentage of likelihood to characters, marking down guys like Ridley or K. Rool to 75% percent or whatever based on really flimsy reasoning. You don't mark them down like the just because arguments EXIST. If no reasonable person would actually consider those arguments, they really shouldn't be accounted for.Just like Sakurai could have decided Ridley was too "homosexual" and purple and went to Zamus instead because boobs. You cannot deny that as a possibility without being a hypocrite.
Capcom didn't have Mega Man in their fighting game, so it shows that Nintendo doesn't absolutely have to have Mario in theirs.Arguments can be made against any character. Even Mario.
This.YOU SEE, that's a good example of why it's a waste of time to consider all possibilities. When all signs point to one thing, you may as well just say it's going to happen. Like when people give some (arbitrary) percentage of likelihood to characters, marking down guys like Ridley or K. Rool to 75% percent or whatever based on really flimsy reasoning. You don't mark them down like the just because arguments EXIST. If no reasonable person would actually consider those arguments, they really shouldn't be accounted for.
Well kinda.I would say make Power Suit as tall as Zero Suit, because (correct me if I'm wrong), didn't Other M establish that it's the same height?
Actually have to agree with Bowserlick here even though I'm a Ridley supporter who thinks he has a high chance.Even if the most popular choice was Metroid by 2005, Zamus still got over Metroid as a playable character. Which means we have to try to guess by Sakurai's standards. To him, size can be an issue.
People cannot dismiss that his size could be a limiting factor to Sakurai. Because it can. Simple as that.
However, whether size is or was an issue now the character selection is dwindling. And Ridley seems to be around the top of the polls I have seen (which is admittingly only Shortie's).
Essentially what I'm saying is that in Brawl, Power Suit Samus gets her extra height from her shoulders.Though what about Zero Suit? There is a size difference between the two forms in Brawl.
Well then, I got nothing.I recently got a comparison of the two in T-stance from M&S Guy.
Zamus is shorter, and I don't mean by the shoulder pads.
What about the boots? Or the helmet?Well then, I got nothing.
The helmet doesn't make Samus that much taller.What about the boots? Or the helmet?
Maybe Samus's boots are thicker...The helmet doesn't make Samus that much taller.
And ZSS has boots too.