D
Deleted member
Guest
Unless said alter-ego has their own game series said to take place in a seperate canon, the situation cannot be compared.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That actually sounds pretty cool.I'm glad to see that some people support his inclusion. If not playing Roy, Dr. Mario is my second go-to man (as well as Bowser, believe it or not). I love his overall appearance (because lab coats = sexier) and play style compare to Mario and I really have no beef with clones in the end. I'll be happy if he makes it in as an alt costume. I'd be overjoyed if he makes it in as a playable character, Luigified or with a revamped moveset.
I was playing Melee a couple days ago as Dr. Mario. For one of his victory poses, he pulls out his stethoscope. I had an (unlikely) idea that if the Doc gets in, it would be kinda funny (or creepy) if he has a taunt that makes him pull out his stethoscope and listens to the heart of a character nearby. So you would basically hear their heartbeat. For example, for timid/nervous characters like Lucas, you will hear a faster heartbeat (and Sonic cuz he's a speed demon). For ROB and G&W, you will hear beeping/ticking noises instead. It's just a little bit of an easter egg or something.
I had this idea for a FS (though it's mostly a joke) where he releases deadly viruses/bacteria that swarm the players. It makes the player weaker and they turn gaunt or whatever. Idk what happens after that lol.I want to see viruses as a part of his moveset. Perhaps chucking them like dedede?
>Implying he won't>Implying Dr. Mario will continue to be a full clone.
>Implying Dr. Mario will continue to stay a "Mario" character rather than be the sole character of the seperate canon "Dr. Mario" franchise.
Falco was pretty much the same as Fox in Melee with some different properties (more in tune with 64 Fox), yet he was given unique moves in Brawl that involve his wings as attacking points and now KICKS his Reflector as a short projectile that reflects others instead of holding it in place. There is no law that states Dr. Mario can't do the same. Especially when there's still things like the viruses to incorporate.>Implying Mario keeps F.L.U.D.D?
Dr.Mario is closest to a full clone. You're just using Mario's small changes in Brawl's moveset will seriously make them consider Dr.Mario? It's much more likely Mario will get Galaxy Spin for Down B. And that's similar enough to not make Dr.Mario's Melee Down B much more unique. Also, Luigi has this excact move.
No, it isn't. Mario's Back Air changed in Brawl to resemble his Forward Air from 64 (a twizzle kick where he kicks both legs and spins). If Dr. Mario kept his Back Air from Melee, it would be a simple one-legged back kick.His Back Air is still the same animation aa Mario, why you even use that is beyond me.
If Falco can be given changes, so can Dr. Mario. Stop using the moronic "he's Mario" excuse to why it's impossible. (Hint, Pichu had more differences from Pikachu than Falco did for Fox in Melee.)It would've worked for Brawl maybe, -as a far stretch and still he would be the least unique character in Smash- just not this time. Don't expect him.
There are enough ways to make him more unique.Dr.Mario WILL be the least unique character again if he's on the roster. So that's why I don't think he'll be in.
Except, that as I keep saying, Dr. Mario is a different Mario from a different canon. How many times must this be repeated before you finally get it? If it's ok for Toon Link to stay, why is it not for Dr. Mario?!Falco is a totally different character from Fox. You can better compare Dr.Mario to DK Jr. in this regard. But at least DK Jr. has a different body type and everything. Dr.Mario WILL be the least unique character again if he's on the roster. So that's why I don't think he'll be in.
Why must people constantly have me repeat this point: ACCORDING TO MIYAMOTO, DR. MARIO IS NOT A LEGITIMATE PART OF THE MARIO CANON. HE HAS HIS OWN CANON.There's the fact that, as a character, and I know this has been said a billion times, he's just Mario in a doctor's outfit. (Ignoring his ingame stats and such.)
If being the among the most popular puzzle franchises (if not the most) for Nintendo doesn't "do a lot of service", then why should we have Captain Falcon? He's a lesser All-Star who's only merit is that he comes from a popular racing franchise. Why should we have any Mother characters? That series is hardly worthy of "All-Star" status. Why should we have anyone that's not from Mario, Pokemon, Zelda, Kirby, Donkey Kong, Metroid, Animal Crossing, or Fire Emblem? Everything else would be "lesser All-Stars".He's also from an average spinoff series that doesn't really do a whole lot of service to Nintendo. In a game of Nintendo All-Stars, Dr. Mario is one of the lesser All-Stars. (I also think that way about Jiggs, but she's another discussion entirely.)
Dr. Mario is Mario if Mario went to medical school instead of a magical plumbing academy. Do you honestly think that Dr. Mario existing in some alternate universe makes him any less Mario? He's still the mascot that everybody's been seeing since 1981. Same face, same voice, same stache. He is Mario. Just because it's a different canon doesn't give him any more merit. Here we have Mario 1, and here we have Mario 2. A footnote like that is only helpful to someone who wants to make a Mario timeline, so they don't spend ages trying to figure out how Mario could attend medical school and fight viruses while also fighting Bowser, saving the Princess, and cleaning toilets.Why must people constantly have me repeat this point: ACCORDING TO MIYAMOTO, DR. MARIO IS NOT A LEGITIMATE PART OF THE MARIO CANON. HE HAS HIS OWN CANON.
I've seen this Toon Link defense used earlier in the thread, so I'm not going to bother trying. (Not now, at least. In a rush and all that.) It's an endless cycle between you and whoever decides to oppose Doc next. I could throw out a bunch of technicalities about how he's really a descendant of the other Links and all that, but I'll admit that's a very poor argument.Ergo, Dr. Mario isn't any more Mario than Toon Link (WW) is to Link (TP). If Toon Link is perfectly acceptable for being a "seperate" Link, then the same logic should be applied to Doc. On the contary, if Doc is not acceptable, Toon Link should not be either.
When was the last time you've seen anybody get hyped up about a new Dr. Mario game? "Man, I hope Retro's new project is a Dr. Mario game! That'd be killer!" That doesn't happen. Very few people would take a Dr. Mario game over an entry in another series. Meanwhile, everyone's pining for new F-Zero, Mother, and Starfox. Those series matter to a great number of fans. They would form a mob and slaughter a small town to have a new game in any of those series. Dr. Mario is important to a much smaller fanbase. Besides, those series are still a lot more important to Nintendo than the spinoff pill puzzle game is.If being the among the most popular puzzle franchises (if not the most) for Nintendo doesn't "do a lot of service", then why should we have Captain Falcon? He's a lesser All-Star who's only merit is that he comes from a popular racing franchise. Why should we have any Mother characters? That series is hardly worthy of "All-Star" status. Why should we have anyone that's not from Mario, Pokemon, Zelda, Kirby, Donkey Kong, Metroid, Animal Crossing, or Fire Emblem? Everything else would be "lesser All-Stars".
Agreed.Dr.Mario being Mario from another cannon = Mario in the end.
No reason why he must be a clone of Mario.He should, and will play like Mario. And he'll be the least unique character on the roster.
You are entitled to your opinion.I don't want him,
Source?and 99% of people agree with me on this.
I'm going to concede defeat right here, mainly because I find you to be absolutely infuriating and it's starting to become dangerous for my health. (And don't even think about calling in Dr. Mario, because he'll just let me die on the operating table for not wanting him in.) Besides, I just don't have a strong enough spirit to carry on such a debate. So, I'm just going to focus on this one section because I actually sort of agree with it....All these words...
And Smash can easily reflect that by severing the ties between the two series (something Brawl started to do, given that Dr. Mario's Chill music is not listed as a Mario song, nor are Dr. Mario stickers listed as Mario stickers, but rather their own set with the Panel de Pon stickers under "Nintendo Puzzle Collection"), and giving Dr. Mario his own symbol as a representative of the "Dr. Mario" franchise rather than another representative of the "Mario" franchise, freeing up a space for someone else like Toad.
Would that not be the best solution? Dr. Mario repping his own thing and not affecting the actual Mario series?
Unless you can absolutely prove that Dr. Mario will always be like regular Mario, stop saying it as fact. Because it's not. It's only what you THINK is going to happen.He should, and will play like Mario. And he'll be the least unique character on the roster.
That's like saying Impa will replace Sheik; just more bullcrap that shouldn't be taken seriously.Also: Toon Link is tons more unique than Dr.Mario ever will be btw :/
You've always had a problem with reading comprehension, so it is not surprising that the point went over your head again.So if Dr. Mario has three moves that Mario has had in prior games but not in the latest, it doesn't make him a clone?
Seems legit.
I thought Ice Climbers were added because they needed a retro character?Wouldn't matter either way. Ice Climber was never a popular game, even when the Climbers were added in Melee. If the Climbers were to go, no one would really care.
By that regard, popularity should not be an issue for Doc.
Yeah, and that Sakurai found them unique as a duo character and perhaps found it easier to think up their moveset.I thought Ice Climbers were added because they needed a retro character?
Need =/= WantI thought Ice Climbers were added because they needed a retro character?
How rude, and I disagree. I understood your conversation, you just didn't agree with the conclusion I made based on your statements. There is always an underlying thought behind every sentence, and based on what you said, I saw exactly what you thought.You've always had a problem with reading comprehension
That is correct, you never explicitly said that they weren't clones if Dr. Mario had those three moves. However, you made it sound like those three moves was enough for Dr. Mario not being a clone. That is of course not the case, and I think you know that already.I never said that having those three moves doesn't make him a clone. I said that having those moves while Mario doesn't is already a difference between the two, meaning other differences aren't as farfetched as Diddy thinks they are.