dream1ng
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,491
If development started in 2022, it very well could already be done, and just sat on, since it's a Switch 2 game. Remember, it's Kirby Air Ride, not something as intensive as Smash Bros. It probably won't take the same time. Regardless, most Sakurai projects take two years and change to develop, which would make a holiday 2027 Smash release entirely plausible. After Uprising, Sakurai was able to get both versions of Smash 4 out in just over two years.Honestly, after taking some time to think it over, I think we're going to be getting an upgrade to Ultimate instead of Smash 6. And this is coming from someone who would rather have a new game. There are just a few things lining up.
Sakurai is working on Kirby's Air Ride 2. Taking game development schedules into account, this kinda suggests that we would be getting Smash 6 in 2028 at the absolute earliest. I can't see Nintendo waiting that long to have one of their megaton series on the Switch
Not just that, but if the next Smash rebuilds its roster and therefore has a smaller base but more ongoing DLC (with a permanent team instead of a skeleton crew), that would truncate pre-release development time, shifting part of it to post-release, allowing the game to come out earlier.
And that's all under the assumption Sakurai would be directing it instead of just being a producer and advisor. If he's less involved, it would be that much easier for him to juggle both projects, especially considering Air Riders was likewise developed by Bamco.
The timeline does line up for a Smash game to still come out in 2027, which, if 3D Mario and Gen 10 are next year, would be a realistic timeframe.
I agree with that, but that doesn't mean every kind of game will be an enhanced released. If you look at the kind of titles that are getting these releases, it's ones which don't serve as an ongoing platform of content like Smash, Splatoon, or Animal Crossing.Enhanced versions of Switch games seem to be a big thing on Switch 2. We're definitely getting more than the six that have been announced
Because release of that kind of game would take away from a new, better-selling title, either because you'd need to support it instead, or it would merely exist briefly before the new title showed up, making any substantial new content made for it... a questionable choice.
So Switch 2 Engage, or XC3, or Pikmin 4 versions, sure. Switch 2 Forgotten Land doesn't inhibit a new Kirby releasing basically whenever. Switch 2 Splatoon, Mario Kart, Animal Crossing, Smash... I think they're going to want the new, better-selling titles with their extended, years-long, service-like rollout.
Renegotiation would still be necessary, because it's likely the contracts specify the specific native platform of release, so any changes to that would require amendments and probably further compensation.Because it would still be Ultimate, running off the same game card as a base, there would be no need to renegotiate to bring back content from third parties.
Furthermore, if you kept the existing DLC as DLC you again had to buy, that would undercut how Switch 2 Editions present themselves; as more complete packages. But if you moved the DLC characters to base, you would absolutely have to form new contracts, given how the payment would be totally different for the license holders. And some of the license holders are far more receptive to their content being DLC, given the back-end they are entitled to. Which ironically would probably make negotiating for a new game where they could remain as DLC easier.
Not only that, but if you offer Ultimate as a Switch 2 Edition, it likely means there's no Smash 6 on the upcoming horizon. So now Nintendo is forgoing that (egregious) $80 to offer their Smash game at the cost of a mere upgrade to the millions and millions of existing Ultimate owners. And again, this differs from Zelda, for instance, because one Zelda doesn't inhibit more from showing up. Eventually Switch 2 will obviously gets its own original Zelda.